Local

696

United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 696 - Dayton, Ohio

Welcome to the UAW Local 696 website - UAW Local 696 Dayton, Ohio Proudly represents the men and women of Delphi Chassis - Needmore Road Operations, Johnson Controls Incorporated and Plastech.

 

Questions Archive February 2005 - June 2006

 

June 2006

 

Submitted date 6/23/06

 

Q) As of right now the permanent supplemental employees that were hired back in 2004 have no flow back rights to GM.  But with GM getting many more to retire than expected,  and if they then accept all the Delphi employees that do have flow back rights, is there then a possibility that they would allow the permanent supplemental people the chance to flow back?

Q) What will happen to the employees with less than 26 years seniority that have in to flow back but never get an offer from that particular plant that they have in for? Will GM eventually come to them with 1 final offer somewhere or will that employee just be stuck at Delphi.


 Response date 6/26/06

A) Any offer or consideration outside the current negotiated special attrition and or buy out programs would be speculation. It would be inappropriate to guess on what any future provision would include if they were negotiated. As always,  any additional information will be communicated as it is received. 


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/18/06

 

Q) Recently, we received an inquiry from a member questioning the targeting of a member in plant 6, and the discipline of our Shop Chairman.  The following is in response to that inquiry. This letter will not be posted in order to protect privacy. In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster UAW Local 696


 Response date 6/22/06

A) Regarding the targeting of the person in Plant 6, we stand against managements actions in this particular case. We are rapidly processing grievances, through normal procedures, in effort to resolve this issue.

    The safety issues in question, which led to myself being disciplined, seem to be improving.  There has been a renewed effort in keeping this are clean, and management has been reacting to safety issues much faster than in the past. We will continue to focus on this area until this issue is resolved.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/20/06

 

Q) When will we know about the 40k, 70k,and the 140k?


 Response date 6/21/06

A) The details, of the supplement to the Special Attrition Program, have not yet been defined or approved by the Bankruptcy Court.  The judge is scheduled to rule on this supplement on June 29, 2006. As soon as we receive any additional information in regards to this supplement, it will forwarded to the membership immediately. You can always click the Delphi link from the main page to view the latest information.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/09/06

 

Q) I worked there until March 24th, 2006. At the time that I terminated my employment, members of the union told me to check back if a buyout came as I may still be eligible for it. Today I heard there is going to be a buyout of 70,000 to members with 10 years or less and I want to know if I am eligible for payment. I worked there 8 years in 504 dept. on 1st shift.


 Response date 6/21/06

A) The details, of the supplement to the Special Attrition Program, have not yet been defined or approved by the Bankruptcy Court.  The judge is scheduled to rule on this supplement on June 29, 2006. Normally you would have to be an active member at the time of the offer in order to be eligible.  As stated previously, as soon as we receive any additional information in regards to this supplement, it will forwarded to the membership immediately.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/13/06

 

Q) Some of the supervisors that were once union want to come back to the floor. Now my question is I want to know if this is possible and if this is possible I want to know how in the world they got that right to do that, Because these supervisors are in many instances the worst supervisors to work with and for because they are unfair and always trying to throw people out and they have forgotten they were workers to begin with, They birddog their employees and are just out to write someone up so they look good. I feel this is really wrong I don't believe they should be able to come back to the union side. And another thing is have they had to pay union dues all this time and if they haven't then they have the best of both worlds they can pick on union employees cause them to loose their job and when they want come back and join the very workers they were out to get rid of I mean talk about dividing the union what say the rest of you.


 Response date 6/21/06

A) The National Agreement does provide an avenue for union members, who have went to management, to return to the floor. The agreement does state that these members will have their seniority stopped after 120 days, and that no one can be laid off as a result of their return. Although you may not personally agree with this provision, it is a part of our National Agreement.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/19/06

 

Q) Recently, we received an inquiry from a member in regards to an issue in the plant.  The following is in response to that inquiry. In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster UAW Local 696


 Response date 6/21/06

A) Do to the fact that this website is available to anyone, including management, we refuse to discuss personal issues on this site.  As always, we prefer to discuss these issues either in the plant or at the union hall.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/16/06

 

Q) If I sign up for a buyout, and we end up striking before my date to leave, how will this effect my buyout? Will I be forfeiting my buyout by striking? I feel this is a very important question that needs to be addressed.


 Response date 6/20/06

A) If the recent buyout agreement is approved by the Bankruptcy Court and you qualify for the buyout prior to a possible strike at Delphi, your request would still be valid. However, there may be a problem acquiring any needed credited service if you were on strike. I would suggest that you speak with your Benefits Rep. concerning your individual situation.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/19/06

 

Q) I hope our local leadership would let the international know that jobs should be made available to all Delphi workers at all the GM plants not just a few assembly plants and others that are far from Dayton. There are several plants less than 3 hrs from Dayton and it seems they are not accepting flow backs.  Some of us would like to go to  plants that are closer to home but the trend seems to
be that those plants are back filling jobs with temporary employees, and the jobs are not being offered to us.


 Response date 6/20/06

A) We have had conversation with the International Union over the use of temporary replacements in lieu of honoring flow backs, specifically at Sharonville SPO. The International continues to have conversations with the GM in attempt to resolve these issues. Your concerns will be forwarded to the International Servicing Rep for consideration.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/18/06

 

Q) Is there something in our contract that if they close the plant or you get laid off, Delphi will pay for you to go to school?


 Response date 6/20/06

A) Employees on layoff under the 1990, 1993, and 1996 GM-UAW National Agreement AND the 1999 GM-UAW-Delphi National Agreements will be processed under the Active Provisions of the Plan. Meaning, that full-time employees with 90 days seniority and on the Active employment roll or temporary layoff is eligible for:
Degree related: $4600
Job Related: $2200
Personal Enhancement: $1450
Those employees who are laid-off or become INACTIVE (*closed plant status) under the 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 UAW-GM-Delphi agreement is entitled to the following lump sum tuition assistance:
4 years seniority or more $8400
3-4 years seniority $7400
1-3 years seniority $6400

Those individuals who are retiring in the 26 - 29 years of service package are eligible for ACTIVE tuition assistance.


*Only employees on LAYOFF from a "CLOSED PLANT" who are not on "Protected Status" will be processed under the Laid-off Provision of the Plan


In Solidarity - Tony Curington, 1st Vice President - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/18/06

 

Q) I have asked 2 or 3 questions and they are not being posted. Can you tell me why you are not posting them, it has been a week now. I was not vulgar or rude just because they are difficult questions doesn't mean you can skip them or act like you didn't get them. I would like to have answers.


 Response date 6/19/06

A) Questions submitted ,depending on the nature of the question, are directed to different elected and appointed individuals for answers. Delays sometimes occur when those individuals are out of the plant or need assistance in providing a proper response to a question, this sometimes causes a delay to a question.
     In addition, the leadership attempts to answer all questions, however there have been a small number that a decision was made not to respond to. If you feel that your question may be one that the decision was not to answer, feel free to contact me and I will be more than happy to discuss the matter with you.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Numerous questions have been received pertaining to details of the supplement to the Special Attrition Program, example (deadlines for sign-up, deadlines for acquiring seniority, is it retroactive). The following answer is in response to those questions. In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696 


 Response date 6/15/06

A) We are currently awaiting approval, by the Bankruptcy Court, for the proposed buyout supplement to the Special Attrition Program (40K, 70K, 140K). Once that approval is received, along with the details of the buyout supplement, this information will be immediately communicated to the membership.


In Solidarity - Andy Stidham, Cindy Napier, Benefits Representatives - UAW Local 696  


 

 

Submitted date 6/11/06

 

Q) I think it would be helpful for the union to list phone #'s to all of the UAW local's along with the Cisco #'s of the plants so we could call and see if the plants are accepting flow backs.


 Response date 6/12/06

 Flow back "CLICK HERE"

A) I have updated the flow back page with the Cisco and Local union phone numbers. You can access this page from the flow back link on the home page or click the link above.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/11/06

 

Q) I have 8.5 years seniority and would like to transfer back to GM but I don't want to move across the country. I have friends in Mansfield and they say people who are leaving are not going to be replaced and that plant is just going to down size, is there any way for us to know if this is true or not? We have all been promised job flow back to GM but will GM tell you which plants you HAVE TO GO TO, or will we have a choice? Any information would be very helpful, Thank you !


 Response date 6/12/06

A) I have spoke to one of the bargaining committee members at Mansfield and he indicated that like many of the GM locations, that not all of the retirements are going to be replaced, and the exact number will not be determined until the retirements are complete. His estimations for flow backs are between 25 and 100. At the present time those considering flow backs can make application for 1 area hire and 1 extended area hire of their choice. We have no way of knowing whether or not that will change going forward. I would suggest that if you any further questions please feel free to contact myself or your elected representative.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 

 

 

Submitted date 6/08/06

 

Q) I couldn't agree more with the comments recently made regarding brother Lamb. However; I would like to say I believe brother Lambs heart is in the right place. That said, I'm tired of logging onto Future of The Union, Detroit Free Press and the Dayton Daily and seeing Dan's comments as though he speaks for all members. I understand free speech but criticizing this unions elected officials through the media is despicable. SOS is nothing more than a group of Monday morning quarterbacks trying to hang on to a past, unwilling to deal with the present, with no real plan for the future. It takes more than a good pair of New Balances and a willingness to walk off the job to lead and represent the members of this union.


 Response date 6/08/06

A) Thank you for your comments.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 5/16/06

 

Q)  I would like to know what type of retirements qualify for the 35K, and where can I get a copy of it.


 Response date 6/08/06

A) The Special Attrition Program under GM and Delphi offers $35,000 dollars for normal or early voluntary retirements retroactive back to October 1,2005.

    This language is in the Supplemental Agreement book covering Pensions, in Article II, sections 1 and 2 on page 4.  We have inserted a copy of this language below.

    If you have any questions,  please call Benefits at 455-5146 or 455-5394.

In Solidarity - Andy Stidham, Cindy Napier, Benefits Representatives - UAW Local 696  


 

 

Submitted date 6/06/06

 

Q) Who is Dan Lamb? Why is someone who ran in 3 different union elections and has never won, saying he represents the union and gives his opinions at press conferences. Who does he speak for?


 Response date 6/07/06

A) Recently, there have been comments made in articles printed in the Detroit Free Press, Dayton Daily News, and on the Socialist Worker website. These comments are being expressed by Local 696 member Dan Lamb and are to be considered as opinions of an individual member and not as a position or direction of the Local or International Union. Furthermore,  any statements by brother Lamb stating he has received and followed directions from the Local Union leadership in calling press conferences,  or making statements for the leadership are false,  and once again should be considered as statements or opinions of an individual holding no official elected or appointed position in the union. All positions and statements for our union will clearly be communicated by an elected official of the International or Local union as the need may dictate. We hope this will help clarify the questions and concerns of this issue and encourage anyone with further concerns to contact us.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 


 

Submitted date 6/05/06

 

Q) Just a request for some information. The UAW Staff Link appears to be up. In as much as I've not been contacted with the relevant log-in info, either there's an oversight or I misunderstood and am denied access. Either way I'd like to know, please respond. Thanks


 Response date 6/07/06

A) The UAW Staff LInk was established for improved communication between the President, Shop Chairman, and the elected and appointed staff. If you are elected or appointed, please contact me so I can resolve your log-in issue.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/03/06

 

Q) If Delphi chooses to sell or close our plant what happens to all of the funds held by our local which we (union members) have paid into?


 Response date 6/07/06

A)  If or when Delphi Needmore/Plant 3 operations were to cease operations, the funds in the local union treasury would be used to continue services for Local 696 amalgamated units at Johnson Controls and Penske Trucking.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Submitted date 6/02/06

 

Q) I just wondered why Jacksonville SPO has gotten temps when I know there are people with transfers in for that plant, I just don't understand how this is working, even though I am retired and I was a transplant from UAW 686 to Jax, I am still curious.


 Response date 6/05/06

A)  As per the Special Attrition Program agreement, temporary employees are used to "bridge the gap"  in staffing levels until flow backs from Delphi or GM are on site.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696 


 

 

Note: We received two similar questions, which are both addressed below. Shawn Newberry, Webmaster- UAW Local 696

Submitted date 6/02/06

 

Q) What they going to do with us that have less than 10 years that do not want to work here for a reduced wage and benefits, knowing that we will not be here for long anyway?  Most of the people would like a buy out or give us vtep so we can move on with our live's, so we do not have ill feelings toward the UAW.

Q) I wrote the question about Rick Mckiddy's e-mail and everything else in my letter on the Local 696 website so everybody could see the answer. More people than just me would like to know the answers and the easiest way for us to see is on OUR website. It's also the purpose of OUR website. Thank You.

Response date 6/03/06

A)  Your question/statement was centered on the email addresses for Rick McKiddy and Vice President Shoemaker, and also concerns of the provisions of the Special Attrition Program negotiated by the International union, GM, and Delphi. Representatives of the International union presented those provisions to the local union members of all GM/Delphi locations. At our location, International representative Steve Long presented those provisions.

    Your comments make it clear that these provisions, of the Special Attrition Program, did not meet your specific needs, nor have they met the needs of everyone currently working within Delphi/GM. I hope you understand that negotiations sometimes fail to completely satisfy the needs and concerns of everyone. However, the Special Attrition Program does provide an opportunity for a great number of our members to retire with some sense of security, and I am confident that the International union will continue to negotiate for the security of the remainder of this membership.

    The answers and opinions posted on this site are based on fact as we know it, and are in no way intended to be "politically correct" or "let's hold hands" answers. Once again, I would suggest that the issue here isn't that the questions and concerns are not answered, but that the answers are not what we would like to hear.

 In final response to this issue, you asked for email addresses, of brother McKiddy and brother Shoemaker, and questions that can only be answered by the International union. Therefore we provided you with the Solidarity house web site (www.UAW.org) so that you could forward your concerns and questions to the responsible individuals. 

 In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


 

 

May 2006

Note: By request, all questions and answers will now have dates posted. Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696

 

Submitted date 5/16/06

Q) As a spouse of a DELPHI employee I would like to comment on the state of the Union 696 President Joe Buckley.  First...let me say that I would like to see the Delphi employees represented by someone who can play the game and act the part.  "Joe Buckley is not that person".  I have heard from very reputable people, and observed his actions, which you can see by looking or talking to him he has no depth to his character.  This is a self indulged individual with dreams of power, grandeur and bad grooming habits who does not have the best interest of Delphi 696 in mind.  Second...This is a retire who has no access to the Delphi plant in the event of a situation and holds no respect from peers.  To this end...I would encourage the union, with the adversity It and Its union members are facing now and in the future, to replace Joe Buckley with a more professional business minded Individual who will look act and play the part.  I believe it is crucial to maintaining a noticeable and respectable presents within Delphi 696.  Lastly...It is my hope that with the state of the union 696 faces now and in the future my statement will not brushed off.  These are serious times with real problems and it requires serious leadership.  "The time to act is NOW".

 Response date 5/31/06

A) In your letter, you indicate that you are a spouse of a Delphi employee, and I question whether you are the spouse of a Delphi salary employee or that of a local union member. In any event,  I understand your concern and wonder if your opinion of me has been formed with limited knowledge of how our organization operates. I would also question why you would have to speak for your spouse. In response to your criticism, I am sure that the manner in which I carry out the duties of president of local 696 does not suit everyone's needs,  and I have been involved in representing this local for over 35 years and I am well aware that I haven't always satisfied everyone nor will I be able to do so in the future. However,  I can assure you that I have always tried to do what I believed to be in the best interest of our union and its members and will continue to do so in the future. I have been elected by the local 696 membership to various positions over the last 40 years and most recently to my current position as president. At any point the membership feels a change is necessary to better represent their interest, they have an avenue available to effect such a change. Unfortunately, as a spouse of either a Delphi salary employee or a spouse of a local 696 member you have no input into that process. In closing I would suggest that if your spouse would like to discuss YOUR concerns or their own concerns, I will be glad to do so at their convenience.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Submitted date 5/25/06

 

Q) Does Rick Mckiddy or Richard Shoemaker have an e-mail address? I have a question that i would like answered and not a politically correct and lets hold hands answer i mostly see on here. Why didn't the international union, since Delphi and GM wants all the older workers out of here, get for example 25,000 for retirement packages for all instead of 35,000 for some? Somebody in this local union could call someone there and get a good answer that makes sense and just don't tell me they did the best they could, because that's not a good enough answer. Why am i signing a paper stating that i'm not signing this under duress when everybody is signing it under duress. You can say i have a choice but i really don't. Why are the pre-retirement people getting 60% of pay instead the 95% of pay people used to get in the past. I get screwed if i stay or half screwed if i go. People who don't have enough time to go just get screwed. Meanwhile the people in the international union have two !
retirements, one from their local and one from international. This whole Delphi mess seems like the government, the rich or Miller and crew and international union are ok, the middle class or us working in here pay it all, and the poor, well that's going to be us whether you pre-retire or stay here everything we had is going to be gone. I'm watching everything, see everything but i have no control of nothing. I have no way to have input to Miller and no way to have input to the international. BOTH OF THEM SCARE ME. I can run for president of the UNITED STATES but i can't run for president of the international union. This whole scenerio should be a soap opera or a Jerry Springer show



 Response date 5/31/06

A)  I would refer you to www.UAW.org to submit your concerns.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


 

 

Q) Hello. My dad was in the union and I think times were different back in the 50's and 60's where someone really needed to join a group of fellow workers to protect your own interests. Unfortunately, times are changing. People with college degree's of value (medicine, engineering, business, etc) get to command 100% employment and high wages. You can thank the government for allowing NAFTA and all the other "programs" for giving our good paying jobs away.
 
The auto companies and their suppliers are just trying to survive and keep pace with the competition. The biggest difference (or at least one of them) is the cost of labor. It comes down to economics- if the market says the "job" is worth $10.00 per hour, then that's what its worth.
 
On the bright side, I know that many of the IT jobs are actually coming back to the states that were farmed out to India. The wages went up there so the work is no longer cheaper. The same will happen with China in about 5 years.
 
All I can say is I know your pain.
 
Good luck, I hope Delphi stays afloat. Its not your fault if Delphi goes under. If they don't want to negotiate, then strike. bury them sooner, and may all of GM's and Delphi's management be out on the street as well.


 Response date 5/30/06

A)  Your comments are appreciated.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


 

 

Submitted date 5/23/06

Q) Many of us are on the fence about accepting the $35,000 attrition offer. I understand the deadline to sign up for this is June 23. Are we missing something by not retiring now? If I have my 30 yrs. in what difference does it make whether I sign up before the deadline or wait till a later time. Please, tell me exactly the pros and cons of going now compared to waiting till later. As I see it, since I've met my 30, it would pay me more than $35,000 to stay and keep working for awhile. I'll still get my pension when I do go later.


 Response date 5/26/06

A)  In making a decision you have to consider retiring under the proposed special attrition program, as opposed to staying and applying for a flow back to a GM facility. In addition, consideration must be given to the following, when and if the bankruptcy judge were to terminate our current national and local agreements, whether or not GM will supplement the Delphi proposal in regards to wages, and the possibility of a strike. As we have said in the various meetings, and one on one conversations, people are being asked to make decisions based on limited information.  We have given the membership all the information that has been provided to the local, and will continue to do so as further information would become available. In the meantime, might I suggest that you discuss your concerns with a benefits representative or anyone in this local leadership to help you make a decision.


In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


 

 

Q) I HAVE BEEN RETIRED FOR A FEW YEARS! IS THE UNION GOING TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIMS FOR THE RETIRED MEMBERS AS WELL AS THE EXISTING EMPLOYEE"S?? THE DEAD LINE IS "JULY 31"ST! I HAVE THE INFORMATION OF G.M. RESPONSIBILITY TO THE RETIREE"S IF "DELPHI" GOES UNDER, HOWEVER IT IS QUITE CONFUSING AND THATS THE WAY THEY PROBABLY WANT IT,RIGHT?? OH WELL ANY INFORMATION WOULD BE HELPFUL! THANKS.

A)  Bar Date   CLICK HERE!  this link should give you the information you've requested.


In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


 

 

Q)  Last night while working we heard that our brother, Dan Lamb was sent out. What we would like to know is what our union is doing to help him.  It's obvious that he's been singled out.  In fact, I remembered hearing a few things and I'd like to post them here:
Dec 2005 - Mike Weaver said that he is not coming back, this is it.
Dec 2005 - Mike was overheard (I won't say who he was talking to) saying "Who does that Dan Lamb think he is - out there protesting by himself.  I'll get that Dan Lamb"
April 2006 - Mike Weaver came back
May 2006 - Mike targeted Dan Lamb for bogus crap to keep him out of the plant for nearly a month to starve out him and his family. He is also responsible for getting our shop chairman fired.  I would like to know how he sleeps at night.  How does our union allow him to get away with this?  STEP UP!!!

A)  I can assure you this local union is doing everything possible to represent Brother Dan Lamb and all of our members. As everyone knows it is not fair to any member of this Local to discuss the specific issues surrounding his or her case. I would like to add that if anyone has information, or has heard the statements that were mentioned in your question, that they can come forward and sign a statement. This would be very helpful for Brother Lamb.


In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696


 

Q)  Today, at the IPS Seating Council in Detroit, my Chairperson, Martin Williamson, asked this question of Bob King, (I paraphrase), "How is it the International hasn't done everything in it's power to see to it the Union representatives at Delphi are reinstated". Brother King can correct me if I'm wrong, but what he said, was basically, "we have a lot on our plate, but we're very concerned about the situation, and we need to know more", I'm sure our Brother King was well intentioned, but I was flabbergasted. Perhaps my view is limited. But I consider the situation at Delphi, essentially, what the corporation is trying to do to workers in this country, forcing us into the establishment of a veritable "maginot line". Regardless of how highly I regard Bob King, I can't accept this.
The status of workers in this country, and to some extent, the world, shall be a result of how the drama at Delphi plays out. Our Leadership has to be involved, and not just tangentially. They need to be on it, they need to realize, this is the crux of the issue of sustaining Labor's rights in this country, and I'm not saying they don't. In fairness to Bob, there was a personal issue he had to deal with and he wasn't able to stay long. Still, our Sisters and Brothers at Delphi are dealing with the reality of life-changing issues every day. Personally, when the company tosses out the reps, I think every Member should take it upon themselves to thwart the company's objectives. But then, most of what I think I know, most consider wrong. I request input.
 
 

A)  Your comments are appreciated.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


 

Q) I'm wondering why our weekly checks now say payable up to $99,000? They used to say only $2,000 per check. Surely they don't need a number that high for a $35,0000 buyout? 

A)  In response to your question, we are listing the following contact information for payroll inquiries.

Dave Elliott Personnel Director Delphi Needmore/Dayton Plant 3.

 (937) 455-5379

Steve Ostasiewski Labor Manager Delphi Needmore/Dayton Plant 3.

 (937) 455-5208

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q)  Could you please give us some information on Friday's court hearing? It seems as if the news media has nothing to say. Are the opposing sides being forced to negotiate? Is there a timeline established? What's next? Please try and keep us informed. It would be nice to hear something from our union instead of in the paper or on the news.
 

The following was sent from International, and is posted @ UAW.org



DELPHI UPDATE –May 16, 2006



UAW Members at Delphi Authorize Strike

Members at 21 UAW-represented Delphi facilities voted overwhelmingly to authorize the International Union to call a strike should Delphi use its Bankruptcy Court proceedings to unilaterally impose changes to the UAW-Delphi collective bargaining agreements. Over 95 percent of the votes cast authorized the UAW to call a strike.

Section 1113-1114 Hearings

Last week, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York began hearings on Delphi’s Section 1113-1114 Motions to reject its labor agreements and modify retiree benefits.

Court proceedings began on Tuesday, May 9 with opening statements by Delphi, the UAW, other objecting unions (IUE-CWA, USW, IAM, IBEW and IUOE), the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and others. Delphi then presented its case. Witnesses in support of the Company’s case include Delphi’s financial advisors, benefits consultants and members of its human resources staff. The remainder of Tuesday’s hearing and subsequent hearings held on Wednesday, May 10 and Friday, May 12, continued testimony from Delphi’s witnesses and cross-examination by the Unions.

Once Delphi has completed the presentation of its witnesses, the UAW and the other Unions will present their case and witnesses in support of their request that the Court deny Delphi’s Section 1113-1114 Motions.

Section 1113-1114 hearings will resume Wednesday, May 24. The Court has set aside May 26 as a trial date as well.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President -UAW Local 696


 

Q)  If the cafeteria is closing May 19, is there a way to get food truck to come to gates at lunch or even the pizza guy who delivers on second shift to come to gates or both. Is anybody checking into a way for lunch other then to brown bag it?

A)  Joe Buckley sent the following letter to David Elliott, Personnel Director on May 11th, 2006

 


 

The following was sent to Joe Buckley and Tony Keen from the International Union. They want to share this with the membership.

We are forwarding the attached letters that were sent to Steve Miller on May 5, 2006, by Representative George Miller and Senator Ted Kennedy and members of the U.S. Senate. It is noteworthy that 25 senators and 55 representatives signed the letters. Please share these letters with your membership.

Letter to Delphi - CLICK HERE!

Delphi Letter - CLICK HERE!


Q)  Do Retirees that Retired after October 1, 2005 need to sign any forms in order to take advantage of the Special Attrition Program between the UAW, GM and Delphi? How and when will these funds be paid? 

A)  Those who retired between Oct 1, 2005 and April, 2006, will receive a signup form in the mail. It takes approximately three weeks after receipt of the form for you to receive payment. The payment amount is $35,000 less all applicable withholding and taxes.

In Solidarity - Andy Stidham, Benefits Representative - UAW Local 696


Q) This is not a question, but a request.  I  have a veterans plaque placed in the lobby of our Needmore Plant wall.  I would like my plaque removed from the walls of Steve Miller, CEO of Delphi.  I feel that since Delphi and CEO Steve Miller wants to do business with the communist government of China that I and my brothers and sister on that wall are being disgraced.  I would, respectfully, like my plaque placed on a wall out our Union Hall.   A place of Honor and Brotherhood. 

A)  Yours is one of a number of similar requests that we have received in the last few weeks. The local leadership is considering these requests.  Your comments are very much appreciated.

In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster- UAW Local 696


Q) Joe, You guys make me proud! As for you, Tony,  and the Membership at Delphi. You are in an almost, impossible situation.  You've not done anything wrong.  You're largely a victim of circumstance, we all are.  Here's the bottom line.  We've got your back, put a period after that.  Those UAW Members at Delphi should know, the UAW representatives at Johnson Controls, West Carrollton, regardless of how little it may matter in the large scheme of things, have your back.  We will do whatever it is you ask, without concern or consideration for our personal interests.  We on the Committee at Johnson Controls, support, without reservation, our Sisters and Brothers at Delphi, tell us what you need us to do, it's done.  We are all in this together, if it comes down to it, we'll all go down together. and most importantly, In Solidarity

A)  Your comments are very much appreciated.

In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster- UAW Local 696


 

Q) Editor's note, we received three similar comments, all are addressed below:

Q) Support you (UAW) local 696 ?  We have every month and we rarely, if ever, see you on the floor, and if we do you have no answers. That money you say wont keep us out of poverty would sure keep me better off than the unemployment line! I know I could do something with that money even if I pay my house down or off, the bulk of my bills would be low enough I could work somewhere without the worry of having to move my family across the country! I want to support my union ,but it's hard to do when you get no answers or the answers are well its a tough time right now blah blah blah ..........gimme something to bite on!

Q) Why don't you just take an in plant vote and see if the people would be for or against the $140,000 or the $70,000 sounds pretty simple to me but I'm guessing you would not even dare that one! I'm not saying we'd get the money but your replies to the attrition questions are heartless and seem to bother you! It seems like you want to tell me and others what's in our best interest? Fine but Delphi does not want to be in the auto. bus. anymore so you say I'm "lucky" to get to maybe transfer out of state ? I would love to think I'd get to retire here but c'mon get real we all know the writing is on the wall .....

Q) For those of us that would stand no chance of getting one of those 5000 GM flow back jobs, you would think that our Union could send us on our way at least with a buy-out of some kind.  Reading previous questions it sounds like the fear is that we would no longer support the Union.  Not so.  The possibility would still be there that future business could have us called back to work.  I'll support the Union to the end.  Will the Union continue to support us?

A)  I'm sure the  leadership  doesn't spend as much time on the floor as the membership would desire, and no excuse would be acceptable, but rest assured the leadership spends numerous hours representing the membership.....and as stated in previous answers, we are always responsive to any requests to talk to us.
 
 In regards to having no answers, in our current situation and with the uncertainty of the business there are a lot of questions that cannot be answered at this time. It is not that we are keeping answers from you, but often we are not able to give the answer that some want to hear and that is misconstrued as not receiving an answer.
 
As for the continued questions concerning the buy outs. Once again, Delphi has refused to include that in their special attrition offer and GM has refused to financially support an offer from Delphi for buyouts. Delphi did include buyout as a part of their motion to terminate the contract, if GM would provide the financial support, and again GM has refused. There is no offer and therefore there is no vote required. This will serve as the final answer to this issue, if any one would like to further discuss the issue, contact us and we will be glad to do so in person.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President, Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696


Q) Why is it that nobody ever hears or sees this Mike Grimes who is suppose to be our international rep.? Don't say because of all this Delphi court stuff because even before this we never seen him and we still don't. He gets 106,000 a year for a job he never does? Are we sure there is a Mike Grimes and has anybody ever seen him outside of the chosen circle.

A)  Mike Grimes has a significant number of Delphi locals that he services, in addition, he has been actively involved in assisting in helping to prepare for the union's objections to Delphi's motion to terminate our contract. I have known Mike for great number of years, and have always found him to be dedicated to our union and highly competent in representing the best interests of our union.........he is not only a personal friend, but a friend to Local 696.  I'm comfortable that Mike will provide the necessary assistance needed in addressing any issue we raise to him. 

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) Where is the International Union?  Our Shop Chairman is facing discharge and our local President has been barred from the plant he represents.  Several more of the Shop Committee are being threatened with discharge as well.  I can't believe we didn't have someone from the International here the minute Buckley was arrested.  Are they waiting for this place to explode?  Are they waiting for someone to get hurt?  How far is the International willing to let this thing go?  What is the number of the International Union?  They need to know that the situation in this plant is critical and that their absence is only fueling the fire.

A) Your comments will be forwarded to the International Union.  You can call Solidarity House at (313) 926-5000.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) Sometimes I wonder, whose side I'm on, or more accurately, whose on our side. I'm not a Delphi employee, I've not enjoyed the pay and benefits Delphi employees have enjoyed for years. But I'm Union, I am UAW, and I will not go quietly, I will not be moved. When the time comes, I'm walked out the door for my insolent support of Delphi, or more generally, and more likely, my support of the Union, I'll do it serenely. I'll do what I think is the right thing. When it comes down to that call, I won't check my bank account, I won't weigh my options, I'll support the Union, my Union, our Union, without reservation, I'll focus on what I owe those who went before us, and my obligation to those who come after us. Everything else, is jazz. No, I will not go quietly, I will not be moved.

A) Thank you for your comments.

In Solidarity - Shawn Newberry, Webmaster (in training) - UAW Local 696


Q) I don't understand. Why is the strike vote to be taken after significant changes to the contract had already been made? What am I missing?

A) Every UAW member needs to realize that there have been NO significant changes to the contract proposal submitted by Delphi Corporation.  All of the announced changes to the initial proposal such as the $70,000 and $140,000 buyouts for Delphi workers and the increased pay rates are contingent upon General Motors agreeing to fund those changes.  To date, General Motors has refused to do so.  The Delphi contract facing the UAW is essentially the same as the initial proposal Delphi presented at the onset of the bankruptcy process.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) Recently Joe Buckley wrote "The recently negotiated special attrition agreement was intended to allow older seniority members to retire under an incentivized program. This would result in increased opportunities for younger members to retain their employment within Delphi/GM performing good paying jobs with good benefits. In the past, our union has been very successful in addressing the needs of all its members. I am confident they’re doing everything possible to continue to do the same in our current situation. Being granted an option of flowing to a GM facility, to maintain good wages and benefits, is better than not having any alternative at all. I am sure that the several hundred members that came here from Hamilton, Norwood, and other closed facilities from around the country appreciated the opportunity to continue working at a UAW plant where they continued to enjoy a standard of living provided to them under a UAW contract. Unfortunately, there are no guarantees for the future. Often life is about choices. Fortunately in our current situation, we have a choice. It’s a choice that has to be made on an individual basis, taking into account each individual’s needs and circumstances. While we might not like the choices before us, we need to appreciate that we at least have a choice"

What choice are you speaking of? I have just over 7 years in. Do you honestly think with 10's of thousands of jobs at stake in the U.S. that I will have a "Choice" to flow back to GM? GM stated 5000 openings. I will not fall into that "lucky" group.  That leave thousands without jobs! What is being done for the majority who are going to be left unemployed? We are only interested in a buyout of some sort. Let's be realistic here. I sincerely hope our concerns are being VERY SERIOUSLY considered by our union.

A) The 5000 openings you refer to is the minimum number agreed to by General Motors.  The parties have committed to provide an opportunity for all Delphi employees who desire to flow to GM the opportunity to do so.  Obviously, when and where are questions that there are no answers for at this time. 

The UAW has been successful in representing the best interests of all its members and I believe that it will continue to do the same as we face the challenges that lie ahead.

As we move forward we may be faced with having to fight to protect our wages, our benefits and our American way of life.  This way of life is a result of the dedication and sacrifice of those that came before us.

Your choice is to give up… or support your union and your fellow union brothers and sisters in defending our rights.

To support us as we demand that Delphi and the corporations of this country be held accountable to the American workers who have provided them the revenue and resources to build operations all over the world. 

To support us as we fight their attempts to run away from decent wages benefits, and safety standards afforded by negotiated union contracts. 

To support us as we seek to hold accountable the same corporations and their executives for seeking bankruptcy court approval to reduce its employees wages and benefits to near poverty level, while arrogantly seeking from the same court approval to give executives multimillion dollar bonuses for putting the North American operations into bankruptcy.

For those like yourself that have the majority of your working life ahead of you, a buyout will not provide the security needed by you and your family until you reach retirement. If the labor movement fails to defend itself against the threat of elimination of the manufacturing base of this country, a $70,000 or $140,000 buyout will not prevent you from entering into poverty.

In summation, the concerns and best interests of all UAW members have and always will continue to be the sole objective of this union and its leadership.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


 

Q) Editor's note, we received two similar comments, both are addressed below:

Q) I would like to know why those of us that transferred to Delphi from other GM plants, and those that worked for Delphi their whole life and did not sign quit slips like GM workers that transferred to Saturn did. I understand when they were brought back to GM, they were given a one time choice to keep their individual pension or be given a GM pension. We did not quit GM, they quit us. We should have GM pensions just like they do. Thank You 

Q) I HAVE RECENTLY RETIRED AND RECEIVED FROM A ""BANKRUPTCY COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF NEW YORK A PROOF OF CLAIM PAPER! I WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT MY RETIREMENT WAS UNTOUCHABLE WHEN I HAD SIGNED THE RETIREMENT PAPERS! NOW I RECEIVE THIS IN THE MAIL! YES, I KNEW THEY HAD SIGNED UP FOR BANKRUPTCY, BUT WE WERE TOLD THAT GENERAL HAD GIVEN THEM A SET AMOUNT TO BE PUT AWAY FOR THE RETIREMENT. IS THERE ANY TRUTH TO ""SINCE DELPHI DID NOT MAKE IT AFTER THE INITIAL SPIN-OFF, IS GENERAL MOTORS NOW RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR RETIREMENT? SHOULD I SEE A LAWYER ABOUT FILING THIS CLAIM! I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT THE UAW WOULD HAVE SENT A LETTER TO ALL THE AFFECTED ABOUT THIS CLAIM PAPER? HOPE TO SEE YOUR ANSWER SOON!

A) All of the information we have regarding the Delphi Bar Date letters is listed on a separate page on this website.  Click on the Delphi - Bar Date link for information.  The GM Pension Benefits guarantee letter addresses the responsibilities of General Motors regarding our pensions and retirement benefits.  CLICK HERE to view the GM Pension Benefit Guarantee Letter.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


 

April 2006

Q) I received a letter from Delphi Corporation this week about a "Bar Date" and filing a claim.  What am I supposed to do with this?

A) These letters were sent to all creditors or potential creditors of Delphi, including all employees.  The UAW is handling all of the concerns addressed by the collective bargaining agreement, such as pay & benefits, retirements, etc.  These letters were sent to notify anyone who might have other types of claims against the corporation.  Documents from the UAW and the Corporation are listed on this website under the Delphi home page.  Click on the Bar Date link to view them.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) Editor's note, we received three similar comments, all are addressed below:

Q) What is the union working on as far as getting us without enough time to retire? I for one could use a ($140,000 10 years and over $70,000 for under that proposed by GM) to help me when the plants go away! And I'm sure a lot of other members would be able to pay there house down or off, go back to school, or maybe start a business! A lot of us (IF WERE LUCKY ENOUGH) will have to relocate to a place that may be going through this whole process again in 2-5 years only now it would be in a whole new place. What are the wages going to be? and who knows how long we'll even be here or there anyway. It seems to me the older members are getting all the perks and the rest of us are in limbo?

Q) Delphi has clearly stated that they have no intentions whatsoever to stay in the brake business. For those of us with less than 15 years in that pretty much seals our fate. Out of the hundreds of people on the floor I have spoken with only one said that $70,000/$140,000 wasn't enough. The remainder are only interested in a buyout. Perhaps we all are mislead, but it appears that there is no future for us with this company or union. Life long job security would be fantastic but let's be realistic... We need something to soften the blow of being unemployed. We NEED a buyout offer! My question is this...  Since Delphi has clearly stated their intentions to drop brakes from their product line and we have no chance of transfering back to GM with less than 15 years in... Is the union being realistic and trying to help us out? Or are we being used as pawns to keep the membership numbers up?  I sincerely hope you aren't afraid to post this on the site and address it.

Q) What exactly are the options for a 50 year old man with 21 years with GM/Delphi? I hear talk about early retirement with benefits for life, but I haven't seen anything in writing. Not to mention it sounds like GM/Delphi can make changes at will on the benefits of the future. All the paperwork relates to 10 years seniority or less or 27 years plus.

A) The recently negotiated special attrition agreement was intended to allow older seniority members to retire under an incentivized program.  This would result in increased opportunities for younger members to retain their employment within Delphi/GM performing good paying jobs with good benefits. 

In the past, our union has been very successful in addressing the needs of all its members.  I am confident they’re doing everything possible to continue to do the same in our current situation.  

Being granted an option of flowing to a GM facility, to maintain good wages and benefits, is better than not having any alternative at all. I am sure that the several hundred members that came here from Hamilton, Norwood, and other closed facilities from around the country appreciated the opportunity to continue working at a UAW plant where they continued to enjoy a standard of living provided to them under a UAW contract.  

Unfortunately, there are no guarantees for the future.  Often life is about choices. Fortunately in our current situation, we have a choice. It’s a choice that has to be made on an individual basis, taking into account each individual’s needs and circumstances. While we might not like the choices before us, we need to appreciate that we at least have a choice.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) I was informed today that Delphi Needmore is hiring people at $14 per hour, is that true?

A) On Monday, April 24th, in anticipation of the Special Attrition Program (retirement program), Delphi Needmore began accepting referrals from salary and hourly employees for potential hiring opportunities.  These job openings are for temporary production employees and will pay $14.00 per hour, plus shift premium, with no benefits.  Each current employee is allowed to submit one referral.  More information is available at the Delphi Needmore Human Resources department.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) If (when) the judge OK's Delphi to throw out our contracts and Delphi does so, what basis would we have for striking? Would a strike at that time be illegal?

A) We have the legal option of striking Delphi at the point they terminate any part of our current negotiated contract.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) Do you know if Delphi and the UAW are sponsoring Take your Daughters and Sons to Work Day for grades 4-8 this year on April 27? I would like to participate if we are. It could make a difference in the mood on the floor for at least one day. Seeing children, our children, in here and showing them what we are fighting for could make a difference.

A) Human Resources states that regrettably, our plant will not be participating in this year's event .

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q)  Some of the supervisors that were once union want to come back to the floor. Now my question is I want to know if this is possible and if this is possible I want to know how in the world they got that right to do that, Because these supervisors are in many instances the worst supervisors to work with and for because they are unfair and always trying to throw people out and they have forgotten they were workers to begin with, They birddog their employees and are just out to write someone up so they look good. I feel this is really wrong I don't believe they should be able to come back to the union side. And another thing is have they had to pay union dues all this time and if they haven't then they have the best of both worlds they can pick on union employees cause them to loose their job and when they want come back and join the very workers they were out to get rid of I mean talk about dividing the union what say the rest of you. This Question is for Tony.

A) Your question has been forwarded to Tony for a response.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) In November, in response to a question on whether the Delphi retirees' benefit guarantees by GM would last to September, 2007 or later, benefit reps Cindy and Andy replied ""The current collective bargaining agreement has no bearing or expiration on the benefit guarantee. The general provision clearly states that as long as GM is providing the corresponding benefit to its UAW represented employees or retirees, GM's obligations will remain in effect and can only be modified by a mutual agreement of both parties.""

On April 4, 2006 UAW President Ron Gettlefinger and Vice-President Richard Shoemaker talked with WJR radio’s Paul W. Smith on air. Smith said that at least Delphi stated they weren’t going to use the bankruptcy proceedings to get rid of pension plan. Brother Shoemaker replied “Although they’ve been pretty clear that while they’re saying that, they are reserving the right to terminate the pension plans and they, of course, recognize that the guarantees we have that back up that go through October of ’07 and so our concern is that they’re doing something to keep the pension plans alive to that point and then terminate them after that.
Which response is correct? Are we covered after September 2007 or not?"

A) General Motor's obligations will remain in effect and will expire at the end of our current collective bargaining agreement. (October 2007)  At that time, the UAW and GM / Delphi will renegotiate to extend the GM guarantee.  Benefits and agreements are renegotiated with every new contract, and this includes the GM Pension Benefit Guarantee.  So the answer to your question is, the correct response is the statement made by Vice-President Shoemaker during his radio interview.  Bonnie Reffitt, UAW International UAW Regional Representative reaffirmed Shoemaker's statement.  We are sorry for any confusion in this matter.

In Solidarity - Andy Stidham - Local 696 Benefits Representative


Q) Can you post on this site an up-to-date list of plants where we can transfer to along with information such as CISCO Codes, etc?

A) Thanks, GREAT idea!  I've added the plant list and other information to a new link on the main page called TRANSFER INFO.  You can also CLICK HERE to view the information.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Editors Note: The following letter was sent to Joe Buckley from the UAW.  Please read.

 April 7, 2006

 TO:         UAW General Motors and Delphi Local Union Presidents and Chairpersons

 FROM:   President Ron Gettelfinger and Vice President Richard Shoemaker

RE:         Bankruptcy Reform Bill

 Greetings:

Today, Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Representative John Conyers (D-MI) introduced a bankruptcy reform bill designed to eliminate some of the abuses that have occurred in the Delphi and other recent corporate bankruptcies.  This bill is entitled the "Fairness and Accountability in Reorganizations Act of 2006" (FAR).  The bill numbers are S. 2556 and H.R. 5113. 

This bill addresses two key issues.  First, it closes some of the loopholes that have allowed executives at Delphi and other companies to propose huge bonuses and other forms of lucrative executive compensation, at the same time they are using the bankruptcy process to try to slash wages and benefits for workers and retirees.  As a matter of fundamental fairness, management should not be allowed to enrich themselves on the backs of workers and retirees.  There should be equality of sacrifice among all of the stakeholders.  

Second, the bill requires the bankruptcy judge to take into consideration a company's foreign operations, as well as its domestic ones, in ruling on section 1113 and 1114 motions to reject collective bargaining agreements and retiree health benefits. Corporations should not be allowed to shift resources and production to profitable overseas operations, at the same time they are pleading poverty in an attempt to cut wages, benefits and jobs in their U.S. operations.   

The UAW and other unions are urging Representatives and Senators to show their support for these bankruptcy reforms by cosponsoring the Bayh-Conyers bill (S. 2556; H.R. 5113). 

Please encourage our Delphi and General Motors membership along with other UAW activists to contact their Representatives and Senators immediately and urge them to stand up against bankruptcy abuses by Delphi and other corporations by cosponsoring this important legislation.   

opeiu494


Q)  I retired on Dec.1st 2005 with 37.5 years. My question is if the bankruptcy judge approves this special attrition program, because it says it is retroactive to Oct.1,2005, will I be given the opportunity to participate? Also would I be able to choose GM as the source of the retirement rather than Delphi?

A) You will be given the opportunity to receive the $35,000.00 incentive money because of your retirement date.  Unfortunately, you will not have the option of choosing GM Health Care & Life Insurance.  This option is only for active employees signing up for the attrition plan currently being implemented.  However, as a Delphi employee, not only is your pension protected, but also your Delphi benefits under the GM Pension Benefit Guarantee.  CLICK HERE to go to the document.  I hope this answers your questions.  If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me in the benefits office at 455-5394.

In Solidarity - Andy Stidham, UAW Local 696 Benefits Representative


Q)  What has happened with the Allen Dawes investigation? I hear he now lives in Switzerland! Is this the reason we are all looking at losing our jobs?

A) The Detroit News is closely following the Delphi fraud investigation.  In a report on March 27, 2005, they reported that; "Prosecutors investigating accounting fraud at bankrupt auto supplier Delphi Corp. have notified several former executives they face fraud and conspiracy charges if they don't agree to plead guilty and cooperate.  At least two former Delphi executives have been given until the end of March to decide whether to work with prosecutors from the Justice Department and officials of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, lawyers with direct knowledge of the situation told The Detroit News. The lawyers declined to name the executives.  If the former executives decline to cooperate, which would include pleading guilty to some charges, and refuse to admit wrongdoing, indictments could be issued by late April or May."  Dawes is mentioned in the article.  I was unable to determine the validity of his residing in Switzerland.  More information is available online at www.detnews.com.  Search on "Alan Dawes" to bring up the March 27th article.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, UAW Local 696 Webmaster.


Q)  I need to know where we stand as retired Delphi workers who retired under DELPHI not GM.  We heard at the event Delphi went under and filed that GM would pick up our pension and medical cost, is this true? We all need to know so we can plan on what the we are going to do.   Should we buy insurance and sign up for the Medicare drug plan or what.  Thanks, I will be waiting to hear from you.

A) The best answer we can give to your questions is one we posted last October.  That is the text of the GM Pension Benefit Guarantee letter. It is published on this website and can be found on the "New and Updates" page or you can CLICK HERE to go to the document.

In Solidarity - Andy Stidham, UAW Local 696 Benefits Representative


Q) Why was October 1, 2005 chose as the retroactive date for recent retirees to collect the $35,000? I retired on September 1, 2005 with thirty years. I get no additional monies, whereas persons staying one extra month received the money. Doesn't hardly seem right. What was the union thinking to agree to this date?

A) The explanation given by the International Union for establishing October 1st, 2005 as the retroactive date for the $35,000.00 retirement incentive was that this was the date that the parties first initiated discussions regarding a special early attrition program.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q)  I heard today (04/04/06) that Tom Greene made the statement that he had no intention of hiring replacements for those of us exiting on the various offers being put forth. Supposedly the comment was made that there wasn't a need to hire people as he didn't have to let us retire or exit and could hold us here indefinitely! Is this true? And if so, does he have the authority to do this? Also is there a timeline when the corporation expects us "high priced" lawn boys/girls to be gone?

A) The proposed special attrition program for Delphi is awaiting approval of the bankruptcy judge. April 7 2006 is the date identified for his decision. If approval is received at that time, the National parties will provide guidelines for establishing timelines for sign up the exiting of applicants. Until the approval and the guidelines are received there are no other details that can be communicated. we assure our members a plan to complete the attrition will be established that will best represent their interest. As further details are received, they will be immediately passed on to the membership.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President & Tony Keen, Shop Chairman - UAW Local 696


Q) If all questions are answered here where is my answer?  I asked if our employees will be given the same offer that GM employees were given to cut all ties.  Most of us were hired as GM employees and in this time should be treated as such.  Delphi just filled to throw out our contracts.  Our stress level is enormous.  Answers to questions like this would be much appreciated.

(Editor's Note: Your first submission was not received.  Thank you for resubmitting the question.)

A) I assume that you are referencing the $70,000 and $140,000 buy outs. That agreement was only available to GM /UAW employees. Delphi refused to to commit to the financial resources to fund the same buyout for Delphi / UAW members. In Delphi's motion to the court filed Friday to terminate our current labor agreement, there was a provision to offer the same buyouts as was offered to GM / UAW employees, however that provision was based on General Motors funding the cost of those buy outs...and only after terminating our current contract. At this time, we don't know if GM will accept the financial responsibility for the buyouts. The union raised the question to Delphi, "Would these buyouts still be offered if the UAW goes on strike at the point the contract is terminated? The answer was no.  Just for additional clarification....the local leadership was scheduled and available in the north plant activity center Thursday, March 30th from 5:00 am to 5:00 pm to answer questions, and we heard this same question echoed by many of your co-workers, along with a great number of other questions relating to our current situation.
 

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) Is Brother Shoemaker committed in keeping Delphi workers in the GM family like Brother Gettelfinger did the Visteon employees? We are all GM people in that respect!! I know of no one that asked for this fake spin-off to unload the components operations.

A) Having known Vice President Shoemaker for the last ten years, I know him to be dedicated and committed to the members of our union.  I am extremely confident that he works toward providing us with a direction he believes to be best.  Not only for the membership, but in the best interests of labor as a whole.  Even though Brother Shoemaker will be retiring at the convention in June, I know his interests are in finding the best possible solution to our current situation.  I believe that even after his retirement he will continue to offer his assistance for as long as it is needed. 

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) Not a member of your union just some idea of how to work out the strike issue for Delphi.  I read Delphi was possibly offering some kind of lump sum.  It's not my business but the stock value has been as low as 34 cents.  Why not have union employees open a Scottrade account and have Delphi put in $3000 worth of stocks = 8823 shares......if it were even to go up to $7 a share that would be $61,761 ......just a thought........with an employee private account you could get to funds anytime.........

A) Thanks for your submission.  Your comments have been forwarded to the International Union.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) How can people sell their jobs out? There is nothing right about the situation at hand here. This should and will probably divide our Unions! 2/3rd's of the people are being used as an escape goat at Delphi with this agreement. We have age discrimination taking place here among many other anti union suggestions in excepting this Steve "get a bonus" Miller agreement!  Employees that had their window opportunities to retire and chose not to were told they would lose any further incentives, and then we have people who retire on their own free will with no bonuses and now we go back 6 months and give them a GM retirement along with $35000. Because i am only 46yrs old with 21yrs. seniority I'm not entitled to anything but a employee with 50yrs. of age with 10yrs of service is entitled to a retirement. Why do i feel cheated with this situation? I hope the leaders of 696 know they need to speak loud and clear on our behalf.  ith this agreement there comes a STRIKE!! Thank you!
for your time and the fight that is way over do to stop this type of agreements from taking place.

A) The recent incentive retirement program did not cover everyone in GM/Delphi nor was it intended to do so.  It is a program intended to provided older seniority employees and some younger seniority employees an opportunity to leave or retire.  It also provides a greater opportunity for those who cannot retire and those that don't want to retire to continue working. No one is being forced to sell their job or retire if they don't choose to do so.  Given our current situation and your specific situation your only options are to remain at Delphi or consider the option of applying for a flowback to a GM facility. in regards to your comment concerning a strike, your leadership, both on the local and national level have spoken out against Delphi's plans to terminate our current local and national agreements.   Brothers Gettelfinger and Shoemaker suggested in their news release today that Delphi's termination of our negotiated contract will result in a long strike. Be assured the leadership of your union has and will continue to work toward securing a future for our active members and preserving the benefits of all.  This has been stated numerous times before, and our only opportunity in meeting the challenges that lie ahead is through a united effort. with the continued support of the members. 

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) In the new agreement announced today (March 23) is there anything about any credited service being restored for people who have lost time due to layoff(s)?

A) There were no language in the special early retirement program that was announced on March 21, 2006 that addressed recovery of lost seniority. The local is well aware that we have a number of members who have a great interest in seeing this issue addressed and as we have done in the past, we will continue to raise those members concerns over the lost seniority issue.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696


Q) In regards to the question about Rick Tincher being an elected official as a vice-chairman of the cap council, that's a wrong answer because we as  Local 696 union members, did not vote him in for that position. If you go back to home page on this website you can find page for all the elected officials. I have no issue of what he says as a member of Local 696, but I do of him saying that he is an official of Local 696. As a member he speaks for one person and as a official he is suppose to speak for many.

A) Please re-read the answer to your previous question.  Holding an appointed position within the union qualifies Brother Tincher as an "official" of this local.  I mentioned his affiliation with the UAW CAP Council because it demonstrates his deeper commitment to our local.  While you're checking out the website, also visit the Appointed Staff page under the Delphi home page.  Here you will find Brother Tincher and all other appointed staff members listed.  This response will serve to end the discussion concerning this issue.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - Local 696


Q) I would like to know if we can use the union hall and our UAW flag when the media wants to interview one of us? Thank You!

A) The union hall and the UAW flag therein belong to this union and its membership.  You are free to have your pictures taken there, so long as it does not interfere with the official business of the hall.  Contact Sammi at the hall to obtain permission and acceptable times.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster- UAW Local 696


Q) Why were the members not allowed to vote on the last offer?  Now the plant will close, or we will strike.  Both of these will mean zero income for the members.  I would love to make $22 per hour and have a $50,000 check in my hand when the close the doors.  Now it looks like I will have nothing.  Thank you for not letting me vote on my future.

A) Apparently you are misunderstanding the Delphi motion to terminate the labor agreements. Delphi has asked that our current contract in addition to all of its other unions contracts be voided in favor of their motion to reduce not only wages and benefits but also to dismantle everything the unions have negotiated over the last 60 years. You say "thanks for not letting you vote on your future."  Under Delphi's motion filed Friday 3/31/06 you have no future.  Part of that motion is the plan to sell or close the plant in which you work and again you are misunderstanding the language regarding provisions for the $50,000 for Delphi Needmore.  While a lump sum buyout may be the consideration for  some , security for future employment and pension/healthcare benefits are the concerns for those that have worked the majority of their lives for a corporation that in its arrogance is attempting to shed its responsibility to its workforce.  If the corporations of this country go unchallenged in this plan to break the labor agreements that have been long fought for, there will be no future for the working class period. I would suggest that we stop looking for the short term gratification of a $50,000 payout and start preparing for the fight to preserve the right of working men and women of this country to decent wages and benefits.  Our future will soon be determined by not only our resolve but ability to unite for the common cause.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President - UAW Local 696

 

March 2006

Q) I want to know if all questions or comments are published here or if they are screened  before hand. If there's not any abusive language i feel everyone's input here should be heard.
 

A)  Every submission to the UAW Local 696 "Rumor Control" page will be published in accordance with the guidelines set forth on the submissions page.  Restrictions include vulgar, slanderous or obscene language, as well as questions requiring personal attention where the sender asks for specific assistance with a problem.  Please be aware that all questions are forwarded to the appropriate union officials for a response, which may mean differing lengths of time for questions and answers to be posted on the site.  If you feel a question or comment you have submitted has not been published in an appropriate length of time, please resubmit it.  Web sites (and webmasters) aren't perfect and omissions can occur.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) Let me get this straight. management shuts off all of the cell phones to save money including our union health benefits safety cacs, etc. etc but the shop committeemen and "leaders positions" in the union keep theirs? What did we have to give up so my committeeman can continue to get free cell phone services? You should all be ashamed and you should have told Green where he could stick his cell phones instead of making deals to keep your perks from the company.

A)  Your comments have been forwarded to Tony Keen and the shop committee.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


Q) I always thought an official in the union was an elected position, now I'm confused. I just read the newspaper and it said Rick Tincher an official at UAW  Local 696. So my question is now is it that anybody and everybody that works here is an official at Local 696? I would much rather see on news or in newspaper when somebody is talking or making a statement it be Tony Keen or Joe Buckley. It sounds a whole lot better than Joe Blow the official hornblower.

A)  Brother Tincher is an appointed UAW Local 696 staff member, serving in the position of Industrial Hygienist.  He is also an elected official serving as the Vice-Chairperson of the Cap Council.  When possible, the media are directed to the top leadership positions within the union, such as the President, Shop Chairperson, Vice-Presidents, etc.  However, it is the policy of this local union leadership to encourage our membership to freely speak with the media regarding their personal feelings and the impact of this Delphi bankruptcy filing has on them and their families.  In this regard, we have no issue with the statements made by Brother Tincher.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696

Editor's Note:  Below is the text of the Dayton Daily News interview, dated Thursday March 23 2006..

GM's early out offer has workers thinking
One man looks at options it opens to him

By John Nolan, Dayton Daily News

DAYTON - The early retirement program announced Wednesday by General Motors Corp., Delphi Corp. and the United Auto Workers union gives Rick Tincher two realistic options he didn't have before.  Now, the Springboro resident plans to consult with his family before deciding what is best for him.  "It takes a lot of thought. I want to continue working," Tincher said in an interview. "At 50 and (with) two kids in college, there is no such thing as retirement for me."

Tincher, who works at Delphi's Needmore Road brake plant as an industrial hygiene technician and is an official for UAW Local 696, will turn 50 on April 23.  The new retirement incentive program lowers to age 50 - from the prior 55 - the eligibility threshold for "mutually satisfactory retirement" as defined by the company and the UAW. Having worked 25 1/2 years for first GM and then Delphi, he already met the other eligibility requirement of having at least 10 years service.

Accepting that retirement option would allow Tincher to receive $2,550 each month, before deductions for taxes and a survivor benefit for his wife, he said. He could take another job to supplement that.  Prior to Wednesday's announcement, Tincher said his options were limited if he chose to exit the struggling auto industry. The UAW's contract would allow him to leave Delphi and return to its former owner, GM, but only if jobs were available there.  Or, he could have quit, looked for another job and waited until 62 before he could receive his pension.

The new retirement incentive program appears designed to encourage plenty of GM autoworkers to retire, which could open up jobs at GM for its former workers at Delphi to return to, Tincher said.  He said he is leaning toward retiring, then seeking another job working for a company that specializes in industrial hygiene and workplace safety.  The Delphi retirement incentive plan won't become official until it is approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, which could happen at a hearing on April 7 in New York City. The court is supervising the company's operation since it filed for bankruptcy reorganization in October.

Contact John Nolan at 225-2242.


Q) I did not have the opportunity to meet the staff people who were here from the credit union on Thursday. I wanted to tell them that I would do more business with the credit union if they would have online banking like Fifth/Third. I can pay all of my bills online there and I don't write checks for anything anymore.  The DayMet home page is ok to check balances but it needs to be more customer service oriented and have bill payments as part of its service.

A)  Day-Met Credit Union is in the process of installing an Online Bill Pay Service to its members.  We also are going to be updating the website to make it more user friendly.  The first trial run for the Bill Pay Service will be next week, April 3rd, with service available to members within 4-6 weeks.  Thank you for the comments and concerns and if there is anything else we can do, let us know.

In Solidarity - Angela Newberry, Board of Director -  Day-Met Credit Union


Q) In the news today about buyback, I see no mention of current retirees.  Where do we stand as of today?  Those retired under Delphi in 2000 are left in the dark.  Please keep us informed of our situation.

A)  Just like the Delphi active workers, Retirees like myself are a part of the continuing discussions between the UAW, Delphi and GM over the Delphi bankruptcy filing.  Until such time as an agreement is reached, there is not much information that can be communicated.  Again, any official information received will be passed on to the membership, including retirees, immediately.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) I hope that very soon, more and in simple English, what the heck is going on around here. a person needs more information before deciding what to do. who do we ask our questions to and we need a better answer than I don't know. This is our whole life we are talking about and we need to know the whole story.

A)  I assume your question is about the special attrition program recently announced.  the local union has passed on to the members ALL of the information that we have received.  We are fully aware of a great number of questions that have arisen and we intend on getting answers to these questions at a called meeting of Presidents and Shop Chairpersons in Detroit.  This meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 28th.  Upon our return from that meeting, Tony Keen and I will communicate in writing the answers to those questions.  If needed, we will schedule meetings to allow for further discussion.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) Depending on who you hear it from, the hottest rumor on the plant floor is that Needmore Road and the South Plant will be closed by September 2006. Is there any truth to this? It's spreading like wildfire.

A)  The local union has no knowledge that supports the rumor that you cite.  As always, any information received will be communicated immediately to the membership.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) I for one don't care if our local has to pay Joe's salary. Who do you think is going to run the local when everyone else takes the buy-out. We need Joe, he has the experience that we will be lacking when the others leave. Joe has always done what's right for all Members, and to that we owe him thanks.

A)  I'm sure Joe appreciates your kind comments.  Having spoken to Joe about this matter, I can also tell you that he remains committed to working towards an agreement under Document 77.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, UAW Local 696 Webmaster


Q) At the Sunday March 19th meeting Joe discussed cost cutting measures that was presented to the Executive Board, and upon their recommendation request was made for the Memberships approval. During Joe's campaign he strongly felt he could convince Delphi to pay his wages if he won the office of President. Was Joe successful at achieving this?

A)  Unfortunately, i haven't been able to secure an agreement for Delphi to pay the office of President. Under document 77 of the Delphi/UAW agreement the company is required to pay a full time employee 40 hours per week for the performance of duties as President.  Being retired, I am not considered a full time employee and the company to date refuses to accept responsibility for my wages under document 77.  I will continue the unions argument that there is no difference in my situation and the fact that Delphi continues to employ retired salary individuals in our facility. I believe there is no difference in the between the two situations. It is still my intent to relieve the local union of the financial liability of paying the presidents salary and i remain committed to working toward that end.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) In response to the "meeting" held by one individual...if you were at that meeting you would know that no one is trying to undermine nor take over the current leadership or the union.  There was nothing hidden or sinister about the meeting.  It was fellow brothers and sisters meeting to discuss/strategize and support each other.

A)  This response will serve to end the discussion concerning this issue.  Again, in reference to the meeting in question, that meeting was called for and conducted by individuals that proclaim to be members of a dissident group calling themselves "Soldiers of Solidarity".  Members of this group have openly and publicly challenged not only the direction of, but the integrity of the leadership of the International UAW.  Those actions alone would support my opinion that this meeting serves as an attempt to divide our union.  In addition, I would again questions the purpose of such meetings if not just to cause division.  While in your submission you say "nothing was hidden or sinister" about the meeting and that it was just "to meet with fellow brothers and sisters to discuss strategies and support each other", could not that same agenda be satisfied at YOUR regularly scheduled local membership meeting with YOUR UAW Brothers and Sisters and your elected leadership?

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) Why are we having a non-union run meeting between workers when we are all in this triangle of problems together. We can voice our say at a union meeting just as strongly. If you have a problem or question or quite possibly an answer, do it as a whole local not a side group. What are we trying to do, overthrow the leadership we elected? This makes us look like a bunch of idiots. What say the rest of you. All for one and one for all.

A)  The meeting that you reference was called outside of the authorization of the International Union or Local 696.  It was conducted by an individual with NO authority in the current discussions with Delphi or General Motors.  In my opinion, such a meeting serves no purpose other than as an attempt to erode the solidarity of our union.  The alternative to this meeting would have been to direct  concerns and or questions directly to the elected leadership of the Local and International Union.  You can contact the local union at (937) 228-2142, post your comments here on this website, or call Solidarity House directly at (313) 926-5000.  Again, it's important to remember that our ability to effectively find resolutions to our current situation will only come from support for our leadership and support for one another.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) I don't think we should be so quick to give up anything. I for one am not going to vote anything in that takes anything away from us, because if you remember GM came up with plan for employees to pay part of their benefits and 2 weeks later stated they were going to get rid of 30,000 jobs what did they save?  I think that if we give in to Delphi they will promise us the world and in a few years they will find another problem and we will have to give up more, because it was so easy this time to get what they want. Also remember when they come out of all this they will have reduced a lot of debt that they own now and if they get us to give up stuff they will have no debt and pay us nothing! Think of the money they will be making!

A)  While your comments may reflect the feelings of many of our members, it's important to remember that this situation is complex, to say the least.   UAW President Ron Gettelfinger and Vice President Richard Shoemaker recently stated,  “We have said consistently that the only basis of finding satisfactory resolution to these matters is through the use of the collective bargaining process with Delphi, GM and the UAW at the bargaining table."  As UAW members, we must have faith in our elected officials and trust that they are working to negotiate the best possible outcome for all of our members, just as they have done in the past.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, Webmaster - UAW Local 696


February 2006

Q) I thought everything at Delphi was on hold till august now it's back to February 17 again. what was the August time frame for?

A)  Below is a list of timelines in relation to Delphi's Bankruptcy filing.

October 21, 2005 Original proposal to modify contract.
November 18, 2005 Delphi modified its October 21, 2005 proposal.
December 16, 2005 Original deadline to reach a consensual agreement.
December 19, 2005 Delphi withdraws it's original proposal to modify contgract.
January 20, 2006 Extension of December 16, 2005 deadline to reach an agreement
February 6, 2006 Original deadline to file plan for reorganization.
February 17, 2006 Currernt deadline for Delphi proposal to court to terminate current contract and impose their proposal.
August 5, 2006 Current deadline to file plan for reorganization.

Just as the prior deadlines have changed, future deadlines are subject to change as well.  We will publish any changes here on uaw696.com.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) I know we are at the bottom of the chain, but has anyone ever asked the membership for ideas on how to save money and our jobs. I know our union has fought hard to give us all of our great benefits but reality is now here. We must give some things up to save our jobs. There are many things that we can do besides going down to poverty level on the pay scale. Cut out July shutdown, and Christmas shut down. Give up some of our holidays. Contribute $40.00 a week to our health insurance. Give up cost of living. Reduce our pay $3.00 an hour. Have company contribute to our 401k and reduce pensions. Cut shift premiums. Work 40 hrs before you receive overtime pay. Any and all of these efforts combined would save the company tremendously. And possibly save our jobs and secure more for our future generations.

A)  The suggestions you submitted are all in regards to the National Bargaining Agreement and are discussed at the National level by the International Union and Delphi Corporation.  We are forwarding your comments to the International Union for their consideration.  While I share your concern for our future, I am not in agreement with your suggested concessions to our current contract.  As you stated in your comment, the "Union has fought hard to give us all of our great benefits".  I sincerely believe that our union will fight just as hard to maintain those benefits and do what is believed to be the best for all of its members.  We must trust our UAW Leadership to provide a course of action that will best represent our futures, and we must stand united to support their decisions.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) I am a Local 696 retiree (1999). I recently received my W-2 statement for the legal plan, and notice the income amount shown is a little over $600. In past years it has been in the neighborhood of $80. Why has it increased so much? I tried asking Fidelity, but all I get is the promise that they will look into it.

A)  We called the Benefits Center on this Question and we were told that you have to pay taxes on all things that are received, like vehicle vouchers, tuition assistance, life insurance,
$100.00 from the clothing store, etc.  They explained that differing charges are based on what services or benefits each person has received.  If you have any questions regarding your particular situation, please contact the benefits office and we will help you get answers.

In Solidarity - Cindy Napier, Benefits Representative 


January 2006

Q) Hey Mr. Buckley,  My neighbor works at the Kettering Delphi plant, IUE/CWA, and he has shown me info relating to a EARLY retirement 28 and 2,like we had, that they have CURRENTLY asked the EBPC to approve WITH an incentive. This is supposed to take place in March or April. If they can get this shouldn't we also be able to get it? Just asking.

A)  It is my understanding that the early retirement that you cite was a result of their local contract settlement reached in 2002.  It is also my understanding that the agreement has since been modified by Delphi's bankruptcy filing.  In any event, that agreement was specific to that plant and the IUE local union based on conditions at the time of their negotiations.

As we all know, the current condition of the automotive industry have given cause for the corporations and their unions to enter into serious discussions to find solutions for the problems facing the manufacturing industry in this country.  These problems and any potential solutions to these problems are not specific to any one location but to the entire industry and its employees.

As we await the outcome of these discussions, I ask each of you to stand strong and united as our union negotiates the best possible course of action for this membership.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President 


Editors note:  We received two more letters concerning elected leadership attendance at the rally.  We appreciate the comments and they are published below.  In an effort to eliminate repetition, these postings will conclude discussion on this website regarding this matter.

Don Webb - UAW Local Webmaster

Q) Concerning Mary Ruth, Bush ran as a "uniter, not a divider", we've all, (who are sentient), seen the lie to that. Mary Ruth didn't show up at the rally. Now she tries to explain the "why" to that. Hell with that. Maybe she just made a mistake, maybe she just exercised poor judgment, maybe she should have just said, "I screwed up" (if it were me, that's how I'd have handled it). I'd settle for that, and keep an eye on her in the future, does that make sense, will you allow her an instance of poor judgment? Raking her over the coals isn't the way to build solidarity, in fact, in as much as she's a trustee, an executive board member, we might want to consider cutting her a little slack as well as holding her to a higher standard. She may grow into the position, she may not, but we shouldn't call it on one faux pas. 

We are very blessed with a President who has more experience and "a feel" for leadership more than most of us can imagine. Shall we let Joe deal with it? Internecine conflict isn't what we need to be about just now. Let's judge all the executive board members on their long term performance, and always in an effort to improve our Leadership, not to degrade it. 

I doubt Mary will repeat her mistake, and through other board members' observation of criticism of her, I doubt any others will make the same mistakes. I know we shouldn't be intent on finding fault with our elected and appointed officials. We definitely should point out those actions we take issue with. We should, actually, we're obligated, to point out the faults we find, not in a spirit of destruction, but one of instruction...a willingness to help. I think Mary screwed up, I doubt that makes her a bad board member, I doubt we should write her off. I think Joe's right. We can't let something like this overshadow what was accomplished at the rally. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, that the showing at the rally had significant impact on how Delphi management will deal with the Membership. We need to keep that going, not attacks on any of the elected or appointed leadership. 

Everyone needs to remember, none of the elected or appointed Leadership, are "professional" politicians. That's, no doubt, a very good thing. But with that we have to understand, we all screw up sometimes. We need to base our judgment on performance, and that's not reasonable to base it on anyone's adversarial proclamation of one's poor performance, based on one act. 

Mary Ruth, I've no axe to grind, maybe you should just say, "umm, I screwed up, I've learned, I'll do better in the future". I'll give you another chance, who of us wouldn't be that fair. We should all be that fair. Mary, I believe your heart's in the right place, I sincerely want to see you succeed, not fail, pay attention to your responsibility, commitment, and obligations, fight for the Membership before anything else, and above anything else, work harder than ever to give us a reason to trust you. And I'll keep an open mind. Very respectfully, a Union Member

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To our Brothers and Sisters of the UAW 696,

I feel that there is a need to comment, on the letters that are being sent out on our sister Mary Ruth, and my friend, who has always been positive about our union and our jobs, kept us up to date our meetings, and who listens to whatever is going on for the day. She is always friendly, positive, and truley a caring person, she goes the distance, and tries her best. I can say, that she is a wonderful friend, single-mother, sister, and Millwright, and we should be happy to have her on the team! The Rally seems to be a sore spot for somebody out there, (who won't identify yourself.) So I will, I am Pamela Martindale, I attended the Rally with my husband Jimmy, I would have to guess there was approximately 10% of our Local 696 membership there, which was disappointing numbers, I had thought that since "WE" Union Elected, Union Appointed, Union Skilled Trades, Union Production "WE" as a "WHOLE" the "Local 696" no division, but as "ONE" would have stood together. As I said, there were so many people missing, from our Local 696, that it was embarassing, when so many others came to support, and traveled a great distance to be there. We are all in the same boat, we have to remember, where we are and where we have come from, and the values that we live by, and the values we have grown up with. If we want to survive (unions), then we have to put out the word, and that word is unity, solidarity! We have to remember this effects more than just us, it effects retirees, trickles down to companys that provide supplies, communities, and our children's future, it goes so far out there that we won't even know th impact for many, many years. Maybe the studies 15, 20 , 25, years from know will be able to figure it out. And our children will be able to read it in The Dayton Daily News, is this what we want? We have to educate and make the membership as a "WHOLE" be "ONE". Maybe our President Buckly or Chairman Keen can go out on the floor and express to the membership how important it is to attended these rallies, maybe they can excuse our mandatory saturdays, so the people who wanted to attend the rally can be there, or maybe this can be expressed in a hand bill, or maybe I could have said hey we have brothers and sisters in plant 6 who want to attend but are at crossroads because of mandatory saturdays there was not enough information expressed or passed down, the raod always goes two ways. So I hope and I pray to God that we will all be one, say kind words, tell that person "Good Morning" ask the next person "How is your day" care about one another, even a smile and hello, will make a difference, but please be kind to each other. I know every person in the shop is stressed out over what DELPHI (Steve Miller) is doing to us, I am right there with you, it is the main topic of conversation, BUT if we stick together, don't point fingers, be as one, we can survive! We will Survive! Always have faith, a positive attitude is always the best! Merry Christmas, and Happy New Year to the Local 696!


December 2005

Editor's note:  The following submission was sent to us by one of the UAW Local 696 Representatives at Johnson Controls, Inc. Gary Issacs.  We were moved by Brother Isaac's message, and we wanted to feature it not only on the JCI webpage, but in our Delphi Q&A as well.

I doubt there can be any doubt in anyone’s mind, that for Labor, these are very troubling times.  Unfortunately, there are many who may feel insulated from what’s happening to the working, women and men of this country.  Some may feel secure in their management positions, some by virtue of their professional status.  But just as the attack on Union auto workers is met with anxiety by the non-Union workers who supply them, those whose wages and benefits are indexed to Union wages and benefits, and retail operations that rely on Union workers’ disposable income, everyone’s status is threatened by the unraveling of what it’s taken Unions more than six decades to build.  

That is something that shouldn’t require detailing.  And yet it does.  Prohibition of child labor, the eight hour day, the five day work week, holidays off, overtime, safety standards; the list is too long to complete here, but just about everything “decent” concerning working for an employer in this country has been won by the Union, not just for Union Members, but for everyone.  Before Labor organized, this country was a disgusting example of avarice-induced inhumanity.  With the degradation of the political process, the government selling itself to corporate interests, and so many Americans willing to “drink the Kool-Aid”, rather than educate themselves and actively reclaim their right to self-governance, we’ve come to where we are. 

Where are we?  There are Union Members... far too many Union Members, who affiliate themselves politically and morally with the corrupt, illegitimate warmongers in office.  Throughout this country’s history, there has been room for differing opinions; honest, informed, well reasoned debate makes us stronger.  But the founding fathers didn’t anticipate today’s media and how it fosters those who respond only to jingoism, false religionists who only want to be led, are so easily manipulated, don’t inform themselves, prefer being told, to finding out, those who suck the teat of the administration’s mouthpiece, FOX “news”.  In other words, those who can be bought with an allusion to relatively inconsequential issues such as gay marriage or abortion, or prayer in school, while the administration is destroying families economically, slaughtering “born” children, and making a mockery of Christ’s message.

There are those that consider themselves republicans, there’s no fault there, but to align themselves with the current administration exposes them as zealots, ideologues, or idiots.  This Christmas season it’s cruelly ironic that what the Bush administration, and its owners - the wealthy and the large corporations, has at the heart of all their efforts, a desire to return us to a Dickensian past.  It’s their wish to simplify things with two classes, the wealthy, and the poor.  The American dream is not theirs.  They want it all, well; they want you to survive, in poverty and squalor, because they require you trading the days of your life for their wealth. 

Right now, off the top of your head, tell me, what is the one entity fighting them.  I trust the Union came to mind because I know almost no one else is.  The Union is really all we have; the Union’s been waging this war for decades.  The Union doesn’t always deliver, it makes wrong decisions, it gets mired in bureaucracy, it’s not perfect, and nothing is.  But the Union, by it’s very nature, with your input, can’t deviate from it’s purpose, fairness and justice, and you, Union Members, are the ones who determine it’s success.  “You are the Union”, it’s not just a “defense”, it’s not just a mindless response, you are the Union, the Union’s shortcomings can be easily identified, and the Union’s failure is actually your failure to be active in what is probably the last, best democratic institution in this country.  

Just as this country has been subverted by lack of the electorate informing themselves and acting, your Union suffers when you don’t inform yourselves, or refuse to act in your own best interest, the interest in our common goals.  You can become involved now, you can start supporting Union efforts now, you can make the decision, just to yourself if you like, that the only support group you have is your Union.  

Or you can remain uninvolved, just wait and see what the corporation has in store for you.  And maybe, later on, at contract time, when they tell you that they want to pattern our contract along the lines of the Delphi concessions, and halve your wages, and drop your benefits you’ll rise up in anger, and expect the Union to save your pay, your benefits and jobs, I doubt many of you will realize then, that that ship has sailed.  Your failure to support organized Labor now, will affect your earnings and benefits the rest of your life.  Your failure to support the Union Membership at Delphi will, very literally, haunt you the rest of your life.

It’s really simple, and for those that cannot grasp this simple premise, I’m sorry, but put this in your head and let it dwell, it’s a war, the corrupt corporatists have bought the country, their only goal is to increase their wealth through our sacrifice, they are winning, the Union is their enemy, it’s all that opposes them.  

We are the Union, we’d damned well better start acting like it.  It’s time to become radical.  It’s time to fight them at every juncture.  Their goal is to hurt us, I know, they say they want to work with us, look out for our safety and welfare, maintain competitiveness, that’s all garbage, they’re out to swindle us, cheat us, steal from us, lie to us…

Look around, am I wrong?

Support your Union, support Delphi, support the Labor movement, fight back against those filthy bastards so bereft of ethics and morals, who slaver at the thought of employing 10 year old children for a couple dollars a day, they are liars and thieves, fight back, every day, in everything you do, fight back!

Thursdays, we wear red shirts, because we recognize that we are in this fight, we realize it affects us every bit as much as our Brothers and Sisters at Delphi.  Because we realize that the only power we have to control our situation is through our solidarity, not only here in this plant, but with all who work for wages and resist the corporate greed that this administration entitles.

Thursdays  - WEAR RED!  As I look across the plant floor, as we all look around, we’ll know who has joined our fight and who hasn’t, we’ll know whether our cause, as just as it is, is certain, or lost.  It is your fight whether you realize it or not, your decision now, will impact the rest of your life, and I don’t believe I’m exaggerating, this war is ours to win or lose, those who don’t care, needn’t, those of us who do care, will wage the war. 

In Solidarity, Your Rep in Rear Seat,  Gary Issacs


Q) From the latest question and answer session on the website, one of our Trustees, Mary Ruth makes the excuse that she stayed in the plant and worked that day instead of coming to the rally "for personal reasons" and then she states that "If I had been told that we were asking our union members to attend under the threat of disciplinary measures, I absolutely would have been there."  Is that what motivates Mary Ruth?  A threat of disciplinary measures?  I thought she was elected to represent and serve this membership, and not to do it only when her position is "threatened" by mean old Joe Buckley.  The first letter also mentioned other union appointees and elected officials who weren't at the rally.  Who were they?  Why not publish a list of all of the elected and appointed people who weren't at the rally and their excuses for not being there?  Short of illness or other serious issues, there were no excuses for representatives of this union to not be in attendance at this rally.  Mary Ruth trying to justify her staying in the plant and working overtime while the membership she supposedly represents stood in solidarity at Courthouse Square is a joke.  She should submit her resignation immediately and work all of the overtime she wants. 
 

A)  Attendance was not taken at the rally, but Local 696 was well represented by elected, appointed and local union members.  Your officers and appointees recognize the concern of the membership expressed in the recent web question submissions and will respond accordingly in the future.

Although the concerns raised over attending the rally are legitimate, my hope is that we don't allow those concerns to overshadow the tremendous success of the rally and the support generated from the labor force and the people from our community.  The rally sent a clear message to the corporation and their executives that the middle class of this country will not stand by and see the American dream be destroyed by corporate greed.  I urge your continued support for not only this local union, but for each other as well.  As has been said before, our success can only be achieved through unity.  Our first "Red Shirt Thursday" was a success, and I am sure it will continue to grow stronger.  We are currently in the process of ordering red shirts with our message which we will offer to our members at cost.

Again, thanks for your questions and comments and your continued support!

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President 


 

Q) I came to the rally in Downtown Dayton Saturday as did many of my co-workers, now I am being threatened with discipline because of leaving early as are my fellow co-workers. Why weren't ALL of the elected people from the executive board there? I know for a fact one of your executive board members stayed at the plant and worked overtime instead of coming to this all important rally and she wasn't alone in not coming, because several other people who have been elected to our union weren't there either as well as several of the appointed staff members. What happened to solidarity especially with the people we have elected and the people you have appointed to our union? Yes it was cold but like they said at the rally if we are not successful its going to be a hell of a lot colder.

Editor's Note:  The following response was submitted by Mary Ruth, Executive Board Member Local 696.

None of the union leadership was told that attendance of the rally in downtown Dayton was mandatory.  Unfortunately it was not communicated to all of the executive board, namely myself, that the union membership was being asked to attend the rally under threat of disciplinary action; in fact, I believed the last directive I heard from Joe B., that anyone having to work a mandatory Saturday would be given union business (z code) to allow them to attend was still in effect. If I had been told that we were asking our union members to attend under the threat of disciplinary measures, I absolutely would have been there. I have my own personal reasons for working that day and I would be more than happy to discuss them with you one on one. I have in the past, and reinforce today, that any time you have a question about a rumor you can ask me; I try to get thru the plant at least once every day as my job allows. If it involves a person in the plant the best method is to ask that person directly. I brought up the problem with our communication system, or lack thereof, at the executive board meeting and I am confident that we will improve in this area. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have to have an effective communications system to have true solidarity, so that we can work together as a unified body. Respectfully Submitted, Mary B. Ruth

A)  The Rally and the importance of attending the rally was communicated by various means to the membership including handbills and union postings.  At the regularly scheduled membership meeting on Sunday November 20th and again at the Retiree's meeting on Monday, November 21st, the details of the rally and the importance of attendance were emphasized.  On December 2nd at a meeting of the Elected and Appointed Representatives, we once again reminded those in attendance the extreme importance of their participation in this rally.  In addition to the above communications, individual reminders were given.  

While attendance to the rally was NOT mandatory, it is our belief that the responsibility of the leaders of this Local Union, whether elected or appointed, must be the driving force for not only attendance at the rally in question, but to any and all functions and activities that are supported by our local union.  The elected representatives should be held accountable to their elected positions by our membership.  Appointed representatives share the same responsibilities and are equally accountable.  Your Union leadership is committed to making any changes necessary to improve our responsibility and accountability to this membership.

Finally, in regard to members being threatened with discipline for attending the rally, It is, and has been the position of this Local Union that members have the right to attend Union called meetings and we will defend our members against any discipline for availing themselves to that right.  As of today, December 14th, those who were placed on notice for attending the rally are having their disciplines removed.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President 


Q) Will the new cameras pick up any unlawful activities to the point of criminal prosecution? There's been a lot of talk about the parking lot cameras picking up on parking lot activity including sex and drinking in the parking lot. How much of a concern is this to the union? Can I be disciplined or even arrested for doing something in the parking lot in my own vehicle? Is sex or drinking in the parking lot during my lunch break or before or after work a grounds for disciplining me? I thought these cameras were to help catch and prevent thefts of cars, not for gathering evidence to hold against employees.

A)  The new security cameras replace older, outdated cameras that were ineffective at preventing criminal activity such as vehicle theft and damaging in the parking lots.  The new cameras were installed to provide a more safe and secure workplace.  These cameras have much greater resolution and clarity.

Management states that when you are in the plant parking lot, you are still on company property and the shop rules still apply.  With your question specifically, shop rule number 31 - "Possession of, or drinking of, liquor or any alcoholic beverage on company property at any time..." and shop rule number 35 - "Immoral conduct or indecency." could be applicable.  In general, it's best to remember that the same shop rules apply in the parking lot as they do in the plant.

In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman 


Q) This is in no way a union bashing letter. I have much respect for our union leaders and realize their job is not an easy one. I have been on third shift for nearly six months and have only seen my union rep one time. I'm not going to name drop because the point of my letter is to improve things for our union member's not call out a specific rep. One of my co-workers put a call in about a question we had and our rep answered a question with a question, "don't you have a contract book... it's in the contract book ?" I couldn't believe it, the one time a call is put in and this is what we get. I don't expect our rep to come around every day, but is it to much to ask that he comes by once a week? Please get our union rep's more involved with the members, we need you guys on the floor. And buy the way, I would have liked more information on the informational picket. I found out about it through a paper not printed on union letterhead the day of the picket.

A)  Regarding the committeemen visibility on 3rd shift, the last 6 months have obviously been more hectic than most.  We are making every attempt, not only on 3rd shift, but on all three shifts to be as visible as possible.  Due to the large numbers of calls, disciplines and other matters we have to take care of, we do not get out on the floor as much as we would like.  However, if you have a question, there is no reason why you should not be able to get an answer from your committeeperson in a reasonable amount of time.

If you are not getting a response to your call for a committeeperson in a reasonable amount of time, there could be several reasons:

1) An extreme amount of calls in the same time period as yours.

2) Failure of the foreman to enter the call.

3) Foreman entering the call into the wrong book.

If you are experiencing a delay in seeing your committeeperson, call him or her.  The individual committee phone numbers are listed on the door of the work center.  For 3rd shift, contact Alan Barnett at 455-5328.  If you are still having trouble seeing your committeeperson, contact the Shop Chairman, Tony Keen at 455-5058.

Regarding the conversation you had with your committeeman, the committeemen on 3rd shift cannot remember that particular conversation.  We would ask that you contact either the committeeman or the Shop Chairman so that your question may be correctly answered.  Hopefully, this was just a misunderstanding.  We are here to serve the membership.

Lastly, we apologize for not having better advance information about the information pickets.  This was an event which was organized very quickly, and although it was very successful, we would have liked to have had more time to notify our membership.

In Solidarity - Alan Barnett, 3rd Shift Committeeman 


November 2005

Q) If I have vacation time left over at the end of this year, am I going to get paid for the hours that I did not use like we have normally done in the past with left over vacation. I have 40 hours left. Will I receive the normal amount for 40 hours of vacation. Could I end up receiving less? Or is the safe bet just to use all of my vacation before the end of the year?

A)  Local management states that the Delphi comptroller has assured them all employees will receive their vacation allotments just as they have in prior years.

In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman 


Q)  There's a lot of talk on the floor about a possible strike if Delphi voids our contract. There is a group of us (Plant 6) who have never been through a strike and we came up with a lot of questions about what to do if a strike is called. Can you answer these please?

1) How are we notified if a strike is called, like if we are at our machines or something, do we just walk out? 2) Where do we report or sign up for picket line duty? 3) How many hours per day and how many days each week are we assigned to picket line duty? 4) Is there strike pay paid by the union? How much is it? What is required to get it? Is it affected by our wage (two-tier or full?) 5) Is it true that the company will bring in SCAB workers to replace us while we are out? 6) During the last strike, we are told that some workers had to stay in the plant and cross the picket lines, will that happen this time? 7) Are our benefits covered like medical (Anthem), dental, vision, legal and the rest? If so, for how long do they continue after we go on strike?

No one wants a strike and we hope that Delphi, General Motors, and the UAW can come to some kind of agreement before it's too late, but we are also ready to do whatever it takes (including a strike) to fight for our rights.

A) These are excellent questions.  We have listed your questions and the responses below.  

1) How are we notified if a strike is called, like if we are at our machines or something, do we just walk out?  Typically, strike deadlines are set for a specific date and time and are clearly communicated to the membership.  Upon reaching that deadline, all operations will cease and the local leadership walks through the plant insuring that all members have left.

2) Where do we report or sign up for picket line duty?  Members will be instructed to report to the Local 696 Union Hall to sign up for strike duty.

3) How many hours per day and how many days each week are we assigned to picket line duty? Picket and strike duty are normally set for 4 hour shifts.  Strike duty includes, but is not limited to, picket duty, soliciting committee, lectures and other appropriate activities established by the local union.

4) Is there strike pay paid by the union? How much is it? What is required to get it? Is it affected by our wage (two-tier or full?) Eligible members in good standing receive $200.00 per week / $40.00 per day beginning with the 8th day of the strike.  This pay is applicable to two-tier members.

5) Is it true that the company will bring in SCAB workers to replace us while we are out? At this time, we cannot predict what the company would do in response to a strike.

6) During the last strike, we are told that some workers had to stay in the plant and cross the picket lines, will that happen this time?  In a previous strike, some members were requested by the International and Local Union to continue running non-allied, non-GM business with the intent to maintain supply to our customers outside of General Motors which ultimately protected those jobs not associated with the issues of the strike.

7) Are our benefits covered like medical (Anthem), dental, vision, legal and the rest? If so, for how long do they continue after we go on strike?  In the event of a strike, our benefits are covered by the corporation (Delphi) until the end of the month.  If a strike lasts longer than the end of the month, then upon approval from the International President and the Secretary-Treasurer, the Union would pay for group life, transition bridge and group medical-hospital costs.  These coverages will be paid for an employee currently on active payroll, in good standing, and participating in a strike activity assigned by the local union.  These payments would continue from the International Union until 1) The strike is over. 2) The strike fund is exhausted. 3) The International President and the Secretary-Treasurer cease payments.

Editors Note: The above answers were provided by Joe Buckley and the Local 696 benefits representatives.


Q)  It's a curious thing. Joe Buckley came along, a retiree, and said he was interested in representing the Membership. He ran and was elected President. Some of us who didn't know him had reservations. I think those of us who felt that way who are honest and willing to admit a mistake, now realize that Joe's only motivation is to serve the Membership. I don't see much ego in him. His statements to the press and the Membership are all well reasoned and well presented. And Joe seems pretty straight-forward, so that's why I think we might want to enlist him in something that goes beyond our immediate concerns. 

Labor will weather this storm. The Union leadership will support the Membership, and the Membership will support the leadership. That's the only way any of us stand a chance in hell of standing up to the "corporatization" of our government and the recent actions of Delphi's corporate management. Delphi's actions, actually GM's actions for nearly the past 10 years, has been a strategy to destroy the Union. What Delphi is doing is an attempt to set a standard for Labor that none of us are willing to accept - abject, accepting servitude. 

It really isn't that different from what those who went before us had to deal with. Walter Ruether didn't look to the past and give up, he didn't look at his current situation and conclude it was too hard a fight. He knew his goal and he fought for it. It didn't matter how attainable or unattainable his goal seemed, there was only one result acceptable. We'd do well to do the same. We can't accept what's being offered. There's no room to negotiate. It's time we fight. Perhaps it's unrealistic, but considering how this fight with Delphi will impact every working woman and man in this country, we might want to consider extraordinary means. 

What do you think? Is it time we call for a general, national strike of every Union Member in this country? It is obvious that what's happening at Delphi is the template for destroying what Labor has gained over the past six decades. Visteon, Ford, GM, and all the rest, automotive and non-automotive, they're all lined up to take advantage of the changes in law that have been made over the last decade. Is a general, national strike out of our ability? What do you think?

A)  Your comments are greatly appreciated, and as always we will continue to support the decisions made by our International and Local Union leadership as they guide us through what lies ahead.

In Solidarity - Don Webb, UAW Local 696 Webmaster. 


Q)  I have read that Mr. Miller wants to freeze Delphi's pension plan and accept no new participants after January 1, 2006. Should those with 30 or more years anticipate retirement before Jan. 1, 2006?

A)  We should start off by saying that this is Mr. Miller's proposal and it is far from a "done deal".  With the complexity of the bankruptcy filing, it is impossible to give a blanket answer that would cover every member.  We can tell you that this question was presented to UAW Vice-President Richard Shoemaker at a recent conference.  His answer was "He did not see an advantage on retiring this year versus next year, and that each individual needs to take a hard look at it."

In Solidarity - Cindy Napier & Andy Stidham, Local 696 Benefits Representatives. 


Q)  In the GM Benefit Letter under the last section "General Provisions" it states, "GM's obligations as described in this letter will continue in effect with respect to each of the benefits described above, REGARDLESS OF THE EXPIRATION OF ANY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT, for as long as GM is providing the corresponding benefit to its UAW-represented employees or retirees."

I am confused; does this mean that GM has our back indefinitely "as long as GM is providing the corresponding benefit to its UAW-represented employees or retirees." OR, does this mean that GM will only cover us "with respect to the benefits described above" i.e. until the eighth anniversary of the 1999-2003 agreement?

A)  Your first assumption on the benefit guarantee is correct.  The current collective bargaining agreement has no bearing or expiration on the benefit guarantee.  The general provision clearly states that as long as GM is providing the corresponding benefit to its UAW represented employees or retirees, GM's obligations will remain in effect and can only be modified by a mutual agreement of both parties.

In Solidarity - Cindy Napier & Andy Stidham, Local 696 Benefits Representatives. 


Q)  Would you please clarify what the paragraph below means to an employee with 23 years of seniority. 

"1. GM will provide up to 7 years of credited service at the level and scope in effect at Delphi at such time to Covered Employees working at Delphi. Further, any such benefits provided by GM shall be secondary to benefits provided by Delphi, any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any of their successor company(ies), or the PBGC. However, in no event shall GM provide pension benefits on such credited service at a level and scope that exceeds that being provided to hourly retirees of GM."

Does it mean that GM is adding 7 years of credited service immediately if and when the pension plan is terminated? Thus, such an employee could retire with 30 years of credited service after working only 23 years? 

A)  The "Seven-Year" guarantee has been a hot topic given the current circumstances with Delphi.  If Delphi's retirees are disadvantaged financially on their pensions, at that time it would trigger a seven year window.  This means that not only would it cover current Delphi retirees, but it would also cover anyone with the eligibility to retire from the trigger date forward (seven years).

The seven year window will not give you seven years of seniority.  It will give you a window that at any time during the seven year period you become eligible to retire, General Motors will secure your pension, medical & life insurance at the current level for General Motors employees. 

In Solidarity - Cindy Napier & Andy Stidham, Local 696 Benefits Representatives. 


Q)  I am a recently retired hourly Delphi employee. Does anyone have any knowledge regarding an unsubstantiated rumor that the Benefit Guarantee is just a memorandum and is unsigned by our union leaders. Meaning our pensions will not be assumed by GM, should the worst case scenario occur. I would really like to find out the truth.

A)  We are always happy and willing to defuse any rumors that might be floating around out there.  To answer your question, it is the International Union's stance that the Benefit Guarantee is a legal and binding document.  The document states that it not only covers pensions, but health & life insurance for retirees as well.

In Solidarity - Cindy Napier & Andy Stidham, Local 696 Benefits Representatives. 


October 2005

Q)  I'm 26 years old and have worked at our plant for 8 years. I have looked at all my options and have decided to stay here in Dayton. Given the fact that I have been going to college and the state of the industry. My question is this, can I still quit and take a buy-out for my time per the agreement? And if so how long do you think this option will be available to me?

A)  Regrettably, there are currently no buy-out provisions for those with 8 years of seniority.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696 

Q)  Joe, thank you for you're response. I had the question about a buy-out. I am no pro at this, but I got out my copy of the agreement. Appendix K special program #1 "Jobs Voluntary Termination of Employment Program." This states that an employee with 5-10 years of service is eligible for a 37,000 dollar buy-out, unless I am reading this wrong. If this is true, can I still do this given our current situation? Also, how long do you think I will have this option? Thanks

A)  There are 2 special programs listed under Appendix-K after Attachment A Memo Of Understanding. (located on page 229 of the N.A.)

The preceding Paragraph “Attachment A Memorandum of Understanding” States that The National JOBS Committee may from time to time and for specified periods, authorize the following Special Programs for designated eligible employees or may approve requests from Local JOBS Committees for implementation of such Programs. Employees must apply within the application period determined by the local parties and approved by the National JOBS Committee. 

At this time the National Parties have not authorized any of these Programs for use by the Local Parties.

In Solidarity - Terry Bernard - UAW Local 696 Joint Activities Representative  


Q)  Did GM give us anything in return for what we gave them?

A)  In order to properly respond to this question, you will have to be more specific.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696 


Q)   In spring I sent 60 dollars to Region 2-B for a UAW ring and 10 tickets for the annual drawing. After no ring by October, I called them and they said they received the order but no check was in the envelope. I immediately called DayMet who informed me that the cashiers check had been in fact cashed. I called them back with this new information. The lady returned my call and verified they cashed the check at their bank and apologized for the error. Later, a representative called me and apologized again. Today is October18th and still no ring.

 

A)  I contacted Brian Murray, the Region 2-B CAP Coordinator about your request.  Your ring request was pending as they awaited a new shipment of rings.  I'm glad to report that your ring was shipped by UPS to your home on October 21st.

In Solidarity - Rick Tincher, UAW Local 696 


Q)  I have an idea, "Steve" Miller needs a wake up call.

You get all the unions on the same page with a plan to show "Steve" just how united we are.  Every member buys 6 U.S. postcards. Address them to "Steve", I'm sure you can come up with an address, and on the back we simply write, "I will strike if needed"  and sign your name. Now no mean or rotten stuff.  Then lay out a time table;  with the six postcards we mail one on Monday, Tuesday and so on till Saturday. 40,000 pieces of extra mail every day will show him just how united we are. Hell I'll mail one every day till Christmas.  I'm READY................

 

A)  For those who wish to contact Steve Miller, his address is:

Robert Stevens "Steve" Miller

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Delphi Corporation

DELPHI - World and North American Headquarters
5725 Delphi Drive
Troy, Michigan 48098-2815
USA

Thanks for your submission - Don Webb UAW Local 696 Webmaster 


Q)  I would be happy to donate my union dues to pay for insurance.  The union is not earning it, so give it to Delphi!

A) We understand your frustration and all of the increasing emotions towards the current situation, however we would ask that you keep in mind the benefits that all of us as union members have enjoyed over the years with regard to wages, holidays, vacations, health care and more.  These benefits are the result of over 60 years of hard-fought negotiations by our union, the U.A.W.

The success of these negotiations is attributed to the dedication and fortitude of strong union leadership and the sacrifice and support of our membership.  There is no question as to the seriousness of our situation, but we are confident that the leadership will continue to do as they have done in the past, and that is to do everything possible to find resolutions which best serve the interests of all of its members.

In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman & Joe Buckley, President


Q)  I worked there for around 5 years as an oiler and flowed back to GM.  My question is, will the UAW, Delphi and GM renegotiate my pension or is GM responsible for all pensions since Delphi filed for bankruptcy before '07?  I will be retiring after '07.  Thank you, and I wish the best for all of you.

A)  In the event of Delphi/UAW members becoming impacted by a court ordered reorganization, the GM benefit guarantee would become active.  CLICK HERE to go to the GM Benefit letter.

In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman & Joe Buckley, President


Q)I  was a Local 696 member starting in 1997 and and I received benefits that enabled me to positively achieve what I have. In knowing the spirit Of 696  "They will not give up... But fight."  That is the reason to what I have right now.  It hurts me and others to  go along with what GM / Delphi wants. But I accept your judgment out of respect of you and  your bargaining committee in your decisions

A) Thanks for your comment and support.  The spirit is still alive and as your local leadership, we remain committed to whatever it takes to protect what we, and so many others before us, have fought for.

In Solidarity - Tony Keen, Shop Chairman & Joe Buckley, President


Q)  I was sickened when I opened my Newspaper today to discover that our International Union President and Executive Board have reached an all time low. He announced that he and the Executive Board would be going to Court to prevent us Retirees from filing law suits for cutting our benefits.  These scoundrels who dare to claim to represent us are "Doing the Devil's Bidding" by being lap dogs for GM.

I tried to reach these scoundrels via email, but the cowards don't want to hear from us so they put us on an endless contact loop to discourage email.  I urge all my Brothers & Sister Retired and Active to reject this concession and demand that All Union reps who seek to block court action by Retirees, submit their resignations ASAP.

A)  The action taken by the International Union is still in litigation and it would be improper for this local union to speculate or comment on it.  We will forward your comments and concerns to the International Union.

In Solidarity,   Tony Keen - Shop Chairman, Joe Buckley - President


Q) I'm a GM Retiree and I want to know how will I find out the details on the changes in my health insurance? Will their be some kind of a meeting or something on the internet or something in the mail? I know you're concerned now with Delphi and I hope thing's for Delphi can be worked out. Please answer my question if you can. Thank You

A)  I can understand your concern about the health care issues confronting GM retirees.  With health care spiraling out of control, everyone is trying to adjust to the changes.  The local Union President and the Shop Chairman have posted the bulk of the details on this website.  Click on the "News and Updates page for more information.  When the health care changes are ratified with the UAW membership, a full disclosure will be given.  The benefit representatives will be given an in-depth information packet from the International Union shortly after ratification.  It is also reported that all retirees will receive information in the mail in the near future.  These proposed health care changes are projected to go into effect in April, 2006.  Please don't hesitate to call us in the benefits department if you have any questions.

In Solidarity,   Andy Stidham - Benefits Representative


Q) If and when Delphi is able to cut our wages to 10.00 an hour ,and I decide I cannot support my family on that salary, will I be able to quit and still collect unemployment ? After all I didn't agree to work for 10.00 an hour we agreed to a contract that Delphi also agreed too.

A) Given the situation with what is happening to our jobs, I can understand your concerns.

If you quit your job when the option of remaining employed existed, you will be considered to have caused your own unemployment.  In order to establish eligibility for benefits when you voluntarily quit, you must show "just cause" for leaving the work.

Some ways "just cause" can be established are if you left your job because;

  • Your employer failed to meet the terms of the employment agreement.
  • Your employer failed to provide the safety measures required by law.
  • Your work violated moral or legal standards.

This information is all found in the GUIDE TO UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.  For more information, you can contact the unemployment office at 1-877-644-6562

In Solidarity,  Cindy Napier - Benefits Representative


Q) Lets face it, the UAW is rolling over. where is our leadership??? We're doomed anyway so why isn't the international telling Miller to shove it? It wont stop with us, this is union busting at its finest and the UAW is standing back doing nothing while we are being stripped of everything we have bargained for. Now word that the UAW and GM are close to agreeing on health care????? The UAW shouldn't agree to (anything) until they know that their members are protected.

A)  I would take exception to your statement that "the UAW is rolling over..."  For well over 60 years, your union has fought for and secured the rights and benefits that we all enjoy today.  The security and protection afforded us by the National and Local agreements are unequalled by any other agreement in the world.

There is no question as to the difficult position currently facing not only our union and its members, but labor as a whole.  The International Union has been meeting continuously to try to seek solutions to the issues.  For us to say that we are doomed is to say that we have given up.  In that case, it would be us who are the ones who are rolling over.  In essence, the UAW did tell Miller to "shove it" when they rejected his proposed wage and benefit cuts.  This is why Delphi subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

No one knows what the ultimate end result will be, but I am confident that with our continued support, the leadership of this union will do the best that can be done to represent the best interests of all of us... just as they have done for over 60 years.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President


Q)  Mr. Buckley,   The monthly union meetings are supposed to be just that, UNION meetings. I am offended by the non-stop barrage of calls to prayer. I come to the union meetings to be informed of news and information regarding my union and my employment, not to be preached to. The rambling tirade with a call to "raise your hands if you're going to pray with us" was insulting and arrogant. Please remember that not all UAW local 696 members are Christians. The chaplaincy program is supposed to be non-denominational, but actions like this are exactly why many people refuse to make use of their services.

A)  The agenda for membership meetings is presented at the beginning of each meeting for the membership's approval.  Included in that agenda are Reports and Communications.  Any member, committee member, officer or delegate has a right to be heard equally and any member objecting to a report or communication has the right to voice their objection under a request for point of order and have that objection considered and decided by those members in attendance.

In response to the Local 696 Chaplaincy program, it is non-denominational and provides service to anyone upon request.  It is not intended to, nor is it imposed on those who don't request it.  Like any organization, our members have various beliefs and thoughts on a wide range of issues.  As individuals, we wish for respect for those beliefs and owe the same in return.  As we continue to meet our personal challenges during this critical time, we need to continue or support for this union and each other.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President


Q)  I was set to retire in April, 2006.  I am so lost.  Should I go on with my plans?

A)  Undoubtedly, the uncertainty of Delphi's future and what impact it could have on our members makes it difficult for anyone to make a decision in regards to retirement at this time.  Ultimately, the decision has to be made by each individual.  I would suggest that, in your specific case, you have five months before your planned retirement date and hopefully in that time information will become available that will help you make a decision you can be comfortable with.  In the meantime, I would suggest that you make use of the Local 696 benefits representatives who can help you with current information and assistance.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President


Q)  For the last few months the agreement on what happens if Delphi goes bankrupt, and what General Motors is on the hook for, was posted on the website. It has been taken off.  Is there anyway it can be reposted now that the hammer has been dropped or is it true that Delphi is not trying to hold GM to the full accountability they are responsible for?

A)  The document you are referring to is the GM Benefit Guarantee letter.  It has been restored to this website and can be found on the "New and Updates" page or you can CLICK HERE to go to the document.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President


September 2005

Q)  Having read the post concerning some token of appreciation for Brad; I trust everyone, or at least most of us involved in the Union realize just how difficult things became for Labor in general, while Brad was President (NOT because Brad was President). Though I don't think it helpful to second guess his decisions or superficially judge his performance, (we weren't in his shoes), I never found him anything but supportive, helpful, friendly, and genuine. Yeah, he's a friend, he's a friend to all of us working to improve working conditions of the Membership. He is and will be missed as President, though, much to his credit and his commitment to the UAW, he remains a vital resource to advise and counsel and support the members of Local 696. So I guess I'd just like the Membership to consider something maybe a little special in recognizing Brad's service to the Union. Maybe coupons for some "tummy liposuction"...JUST KIDDING!, Brad deserves something special, we can bring that up at the next Union meeting, one of us needs to make a motion to give him the recognition he's due.  Brad, thanks for all your years of service, and personally, for all the help you've given me, and in support of the Membership. 

 A)  On September 22nd, Brother Rice, along with 6 other former representatives of Local 696 were recognized for their contributions and presented with engraved watches and clocks as appreciation or their service to the UAW and its membership. As I'm sure that Brother Rice will tell you, no one single individual or position within our organization is more important than another.  It is only through the dedication and hard work of many that success can be achieved and I'm sure that Brother Rice would not want to have the efforts of his fellow officers and reps overshadowed by singling him out for his accomplishments.  I would suggest that you consider personally passing along to Brother Rice your thoughts and appreciation for his service which will be a far greater reward than any tokens he may receive.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President


Q)  Has anyone ever looked into the feasibility of having a 3rd and 1st shift crew instead of 1st and 2nd. There are a lot of young single parents who work second shift. I think this affects the absenteeism greatly.

 A)  Paragraph 8 of the National Agreement provides for management’s responsibility to schedule the manufacturing of its products including the establishment of shifts and hours, all of which is done in conjunction with the Local Wage & Seniority Agreement.  This Local Union has, and will continue to have input regarding management’s rights under Paragraph 78 of the National Agreement.  Any specific area in need of consideration to shift hours should contact their District Committeeperson to discuss their suggestions and comments.

In Solidarity, Tony Keen – Shop Chairman  


 Q) What are you doing as a union to represent the workers at Delphi Chassis to protect our jobs and wages?  It is not fair to us workers to lose our jobs because GM is dictating the cost to manufacture all the work we do for them.  I want to know that our union is going to make a logical decision to maintain our jobs here at Delphi.  It is inevitable to sacrifice our health care cost and etc. but not our jobs.

 A)  The concerns raised in the above question are in regards to negotiated agreements within the Delphi / UAW National Agreement.  The corporation and the International Union negotiate those agreements with input from the rank and file and Local Union leaderships.  Those representatives responsible for negotiating the provisions of the National Agreement are continuing their discussions regarding our current situation.  I am confident that those individuals will make the necessary decisions that will represent the best interests of all of our members.

Again, as information from the discussions, and any decisions that result from those discussions becomes available it will immediately be passed on to the membership.

 In Solidarity, Tony Keen – Shop Chairman  


Q)  1) In the past, when a former Chairman or President has retired they were presented with a watch and/or dinner to show gratitude for the service they put into the local.  How come when Brad (Brad Rice - Former President) retired, nothing was done for him?  2) Last week I asked the question about Brad Rice's retirement I thought you posted all questions? (Editors note:  The above two questions were received within days of each other.  Please note, NO questions will be posted until they have been forwarded to the proper staff member for a response.  All genuine questions and comments will be posted on this website)

A)  The retirement of Brother Brad Rice, along with a number of recent retirees, only became effective September 1st, 2005.  Plans are to recognize these members prior to the end of September. (Editors note: Brad, along with several other outgoing Local 696 staff members, was recognized with a clock and watch on September 22nd.)

Sincerely,  Joe Buckley - President    Tony Keen - Shop Chairman


Q)  I retired from Delphi Chassis on Needmore Rd in 1999. I am 58 years old.
I have an inherited kidney disease and was placed on a list to receive a kidney transplant in October 2004 at Miami Valley Hospital. This is the only hospital in Dayton that offers this surgery. Until the fallout between Anthem and Miami Valley, Anthem would cover the expenses. As it is now, it appears that I will be expected to pay the cost of this surgery, hospital stay and doctors, although I will be eligible for Medicare following the surgery. Going to other doctors and hospital in Dayton is not an option. However, I am also on the list at Ohio State and University of Cincinnati, and they are still accepting Anthem. But, when it comes to the time of kidney availability, I will be forced to go to whichever hospital is first to call. It takes too long to get the right call!
Surely, I am not the only Member that has an ailment that can be treated only at Miami Valley. Those of us who need this care are being punished because we live in Dayton, and it's next to impossible to buy another health insurance policy on our own since we have pre-existing health problems. We have always relied on GM insurance which has always treated us well."

A)  Due to the personal nature of your question, please call the benefits office at 455-5146 or 455-5394.  We have some information for you concerning your situation.

In Solidarity,  Cindy Napier - UAW Local 696 Benefits Representative


Q)    2 questions for you: 1) If Delphi goes bankrupt and the GM guarantee kicks in, and later GM and the UAW cut a deal where the UAW agrees to lower benefits, will the guaranteed benefits going to Delphi workers go down the same amount?  2) Rumor is that talks between UAW, GM, Delphi not going anywhere...what are your thoughts on whether Delphi files or not?

A)  The question regarding any potential future agreements between GM and the UAW would only be answered as part of any future agreement that might be reached between GM and the UAW.  As of this writing, there is still no additional information as to any discussions that might be going on between the parties.  As we previously said in our plant handbill, anything short of official notification from the leadership would be speculation or opinion that only serves to increase our apprehension.  Again, when official information is received, it will be immediately forwarded to the membership.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President, Tony Keen - Shop Chairman, UAW Local 696.


Q)  Editors note: We received several letters dealing with the financial situation at Delphi.  They are listed below:

1) There is so much tension on the floor due to Delphi's uncertain future I don't see the president or shop chairman coming out on the floor talking to the people on second shift to try and ease the tension.  I would also like to know if those of us that lost time due to the long layoff 1979-1984, will get all of their time back so that some of us can retire before 2007.  Why can't the union do something to get those people that have 30+ years to retire?  I think it is ridiculous to see the seniority list and see people with 30+ still there working when a lot of us just want to get 30 years and get out.  If I had all of my time back just like when I was hired in 1977, I would be able to retire in 2007.

2) With reference the the following section of the supplement, those plants under the supplement, are they protected even from bankruptcy until 2011? "The Supplement further strengthens the job security of UAW-represented Delphi workers by prohibiting Delphi from closing or partially or wholly selling, spinning-off, consolidating or otherwise disposing of any plant, asset, or business unit constituting a bargaining unit covered by the national agreement during the 4-year period following the expiration of the 2003-2007 UAW-Delphi National Agreement, except by mutual agreement with the UAW or circumstances beyond the control of the corporation (e.g., “act of God”). Discussions regarding the consolidation of Delphi’s Flint West (Michigan), Tuscaloosa (Alabama), and Olathe (Kansas) facilities are continuing."

3) Being a 2004 Delphi retiree. What happens to our pensions if Delphi files for bankruptcy. Do we go back to GM with full benefits.

A)  For the most part, all 3 of the above questions reflect similar concerns, with a couple of exceptions.  In response to the visibility of the Shop Chairman and President; while the business of both positions is primarily conducted during the first shift hours, we both frequently stay over into second and third shifts and try to visit as many areas of the plant as possible.  However, if any member on any shift has a specific issue that they would like to discuss with the President or Shop Chairmen we are committed to making ourselves available upon request.  Requests can be made directly or through your committeeperson.

In regards to regaining lost seniority, the local union has in the past and will continue in the future to support the return of seniority lost by our members during the layoff period of 1979 through 1984.  It is our hope that any agreement that might be reached to address our current situation will include a consideration to this issue.

As for the retirement issue, the decision to retire is and has always been the option of each member based on their individual needs and specific considerations.

In Solidarity,

Joe Buckley - President        Tony Keen - Shop Chairman


August 2005

Q)  Editors note: We received two comments dealing with the recent notice about the cafeteria usage.

1) This is in reference to the cafeteria experiencing low usage.  One factor for 2nd shift may be the quality of the food. I noticed when I was working 2nd shift that most of the food being served was left over from that days lunch.  It was extremely unappetizing looking.  How about some fresh food for 2nd shift instead of picked over seconds?  Also, the selection is very limited.

2) I would really like to eat in the cafeteria and I don't mind the prices, but it would really help if someone in there could really cook.  I'm not trying to be funny or insulting, but very few things taste good at all.

A)  In recent discussions with cafeteria management, issues of food quality, service and selection were raised for their consideration.  Suggestions for specific food items and suggestions for employee service can be submitted directly to the suggestion box in the cafeteria.  These suggestions are being jointly reviewed for feasibility of implementation.  Through your suggestions, the local union will continue to work towards the improvement of food service provided on both the first and second shifts.

In solidarity, Joe Buckley - President UAW Local 696


July 2005

Q)  What happened to all the people you got their jobs back for them that didn't come to work, got caught stealing, sold drugs and violated every shop rule there was?  Where are they now that your about to lose your job?  Where are your grandchildren going to work?  Just a small percentage of the people caused 90% of the trouble.  Think about it.

A)  The above letter was sent anonymously to the hall.  While some of the allegations contained in the letter are somewhat exaggerated, it is true that the local union has been successful in defending its members from unjust disciplinary layoffs, and in some cases the union has been able to reduce penalties and preserve the jobs of some of our members who have made mistakes.

At the same time, we have attempted to help those members understand their responsibilities as a union member and as an employee.  It is the responsibility of the union to continue to provide fair and equal representation to all of our members and make decisions that are in the best interest of the entire membership.

In solidarity, Joe Buckley - President UAW Local 696


Q)  You ask for help with the cafeteria but all your union officers buy there coffee at coffee pots out on the floor and they sell donuts and snacks there too.  Don’t ask us for supporting the cafeteria until you all are supporting the cafeteria.  There prices are too high that’s why people buy it on the floor so my suggestion is to cut there too high pricing and maybe they will get more business.

A)  Your comments are well taken and a copy of these comments will be forwarded to the local union representatives with a request for their consideration.  In regard to pricing, our Local 696 sisters that work in the cafeteria receive wages somewhat greater than most food service workers in our area and those wages are reflected in part in the current cafeteria pricing for food and service.  To that end, I would ask that we all consider that as unionized labor, we are all constantly threatened by lower cost competitors.  Once again, I would ask that we all support our Local 696 sisters by patronizing the cafeteria as often as possible and by continuing to offer suggestions for improvement.

Thanks for your comments, Joe Buckley - President UAW Local 696


June 2005

Q)  When is Johnson Controls going to start getting the attention from the union it deserves?  We are just as much a part of this union as Delphi.  I hope our new President will realize that we are putting a lot of trust in you to make a change in our ever needing plant.

A)  Since my election just over one month ago, I have visited JCI three times. During these visits I have walked through the plant and met a number of the brothers and sisters working there.  In addition, I have had a number of conversations with various members of your Bargaining Committee and I met with your Bargaining Committee on Wednesday, June 6th at the local union hall.  At this meeting, I reaffirmed my commitment to help them and the brothers and sisters of Johnson Controls in any way I could.  By working closely with your elected Bargaining Committee and with the support of this membership, I am confident that we will be successful in defending the rights provided you by your current contract.  I don’t say this because of your voting strength.  This has nothing to do with politics or elections.  I say this because it is our responsibility to you as your elected officials and because these are your rights under the U.A.W. contract as dues paying members. I look forward to meeting each of you and working together as a united membership.

In Solidarity - Joe Buckley, President UAW Local 696


Q) How can the membership be 100% sure that the election votes are accurate?  Is there always a group of people around ballot boxes at all times that boxes are opened and counted?

A) The election committee works very hard to insure the integrity of the voting process.  Ballots are counted against the check off rosters (sign in sheets) at each location and the totals must match exactly.  The ballet boxes are locked and under the constant supervision of an election committee member(s) from the time the boxes are deployed until the votes are counted.  Ballots are counted and recounted by the committee to insure accuracy.  In addition, each candidate is permitted to have one challenger present during the vote tallying process.  Jim Prather, the Chairperson for the election committee provides the following excerpt from the "UAW Guide for Local Union Elections"

 

1) "Election committee members are to protect and control all ballots and ballot boxes at all times on election day."  Three committee members are assigned to each poll.  During intervals between poll open times one election committee member is responsible for the ballot box and another is responsible for the blank election ballots.  Blank ballots and the ballot box are always kept separate until the polls re-open.  Ballot boxes are locked by the election committee members after ensuring they are empty the morning of the election at the union hall.  All ballot box keys are kept by the election committee Chairperson until the end of the election.

 

2) "Ballot boxes are to be opened by the election committee members in the presence of challengers."  The ballot boxes are not unlocked until all members of the election committee are present at the union hall.  At that time the ballots are counted for each poll site and must match the number of voters on the sign-in sheet from that poll.

 

3) Polling sites, layout of the polls and number of election committee members assigned to each poll follows the "Polling Place Diagram Model" as laid out in the UAW Guide for Local Union Elections"

 

4) "One election committee member is to be stationed at polls during all scheduled voting times."  "Breaks are to be scheduled when voting is slow."

 

5) All cell phones are to be turned off.  No phone calls are permitted in or out of the union hall during ballot counting.  Also, no one is permitted to enter or exit the union hall during counting.

 

6) After all ballots are counted and tallied, door sign in sheets are also verified to insure no one has voted twice and the results are finalized.  The election committee Chairperson calls the results in to the Local President.

 

7) All candidates have a right to have a challenger present at the polls and at the counting of the ballots.

 

Editors note:  The above was in response to a voting procedure inquiry by a UAW Local 696 member.  Jim Prather has also provided this member with a written copy of this response.


Q) How many appointed jobs are there?  Who has them and what are their seniority dates?

A) As a result of your question, the President has asked that the website contain the information on all appointed positions and all standing committees within the local union.  This website will soon contain photos and job descriptions for all appointees and all members of standing committees.  In the future, notice of filled positions will always include seniority dates as well as a brief biography of the individual receiving the appointment.  For now, the list below identifies each of the appointed positions within UAW Local 696.

Terry Bernard - UAW Local 696 Joint Activities Representative.

Name Position Phone Seniority Years App.
Ashburn, Terry Joint Analysis Review 5161 42 yrs. 3 yrs.
Bailey, Sheri Plant 4 CAC 5366 20 yrs. 5 1/2 yrs.
Bernard, Terry J.A.R. / Sourcing Rep. 5305 30 yrs. 16 yrs.
Bildhauer Scott Benefits Rep. 2nd Shift 5476 7 yrs. 4 yrs.
Blaine, Sheila Benefits Alternate 5146 7 yrs. 1 yr
Brewster,  Jim 2nd shift H&S Rep. 6-5658 24 yrs. 14 yrs.
Brockman, Dan Divisional QN Rep. 6-5656 34 yrs. 23 yrs.
Cunningham, Bill Plant 7 / 9 CAC 5145 9 yrs. 2 yrs.
Curington,Tony 1st Vice President / Training Coordinator 5227 19 yrs. 16 yrs.
Day, Phil Sourcing Rep. 5129 24 yrs. 9 yrs.
Dillon, Tom QNPM Coordinator 5145 30 yrs. 12 yrs.
Goertemiller, Steve Maintenance Dispatcher 6-5613 9 yrs. 2 yrs.
Helman, Darren 1st shift H&S Rep 5246 8 yrs. 7 yrs.
Hoelfer, Dave Joint Analysis Review 6-5633 28 yrs. 3 yrs.
Hogg, Timothy Lube Analyst / Ultrasound 5255 6 yrs. 2 yrs.
Hunter, Rodney Benefits Alternate 2nd 5476 19 yrs. 1/2 yr.
Jordan, Christine Suggestions 6-5642 8 yrs. 2 yrs.
Livingston, Keith Plant 5 QN Rep. 6-5628 32 yrs. 15 yrs.
Lodge, Mike Skilled Trades / Apprentice Coordinator 5268 30 yrs. 3 yrs.
Maxwell,   Dave Work Fm / Job Place 5369 30 yrs. 17 yrs.
May, Susan Plt 4 QN Rep 5188 11 yrs. 2 yrs.
Miletic, Rich Plant 6,7 QN / Uptime 6-5630 22 yrs. 13 yrs.
Napier, Cindy Benefits Rep 1st 5146 24 yrs. 6 yrs
Newberry Shawn CAC Plt 5 5456 6 yrs. 1 1/2 yrs.
Parrish, Mike Workers Comp. Rep 228-2142 19 yrs. 8 yrs.
Proctor, Rose Maintenance Dispatcher 6-5613 6 yrs 2 yrs.
Ritchie,Tom 3rd Shift H&S Rep 5246 29 yrs. 1 1/2 yrs.
Rutledge, Calvin Employee Assistance 5547 42 yrs. 15 yrs.
Shores, Dave Audio / Video Rep. 5067 30 yrs. 16 yrs.
Smith, Jennifer Joint Ergo. Technician 6-5635 8 yrs. 4 1/2 yrs.
Smithers, Bobby Health & Safety Trainer 5277 35 yrs. 15 yrs.
Stidham, Andy Benefits Rep 1st 5394 7 yrs. 6 yrs.
Sute, Jerol Maintenance Dispatcher 6-5613 6 yrs. 1 1/2 yrs.
Tincher, Rick Industrial Hygiene Tech 5508 22 yrs. 6 yrs.
Webb Don Quality Network Rep 5398 30 yrs. 2 1/2 yrs.
Williams, Lois 1st shift H&S Rep 5439 30 yrs. 14 yr

Q) What products do your members make?

A) U.A.W. Local 696 represents the men and women of Delphi Needmore Road Operations, Delphi Dayton Plant 3 Operations, Johnson Controls and Penske Trucking.  Watch this web site for a new page on who we are and what we do...coming soon!

Don Webb - Webmaster for UAW Local 696


May 2005

Q) Why is the printing for the "Union Eyes", our Local newsletter, done in Cincinnati instead of at a local printer?

A) The printing contract for the Union Eyes is awarded by bid.  Currently, the Union Eyes is printed at American Printing, a union shop in Cincinnati.  We have used this printer for over eight years and are satisfied with the work that they do.  In the near future, the Executive Committee will be meeting to discuss the printing of the Union Eyes and at that time they will consider accepting bids for the printing.  Interested printers need to submit a written proposal to John Hicks, Financial Secretary at the Union Hall address.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President, UAW Local 696


Q) Why aren't we sponsoring an annual UAW Local 696 Golf Outing anymore?

A) The golf outings were supported by UAW Local 696 in the past, they weren't sponsored by it.  But if enough members are interested in having a golf outing or any other type of recreational activity, they should contact the recreation committee for information and approval for an event.

In Solidarity, Joe Buckley - President, UAW Local 696


April 2005

Q) Why are there so many more supervisors and engineers in the plant?  If management is losing so much money, why don't they lay some of them off?

A) According to information received from local Delphi management, from June of 2003 to present there has been a 17% headcount reduction in salary positions including engineering and contract.  This compares to an 18% hourly headcount reduction from flowbacks and retirements during the same period.  The AHG is paying for 9 engineers which are here working on the new product lines.


Q) I heard that Delphi was fined $5000.00 by OSHA for an unsafe stamping area and that this occurred after the amputation that occurred on April 15th of last year.

A) After the tragic amputation last year, OSHA made an inspection of the stamping area and Delphi was fined a total of $20,000.00 for six citations issued for the area.  The press section continues to be an area of intense focus for our Health & Safety representatives and numerous improvements have been made to the area to improve safety.  As always, report any unsafe conditions to your Supervisor and to your UAW Health & Safety representatives.  Their contact numbers are listed on the Benefits / Health & Safety page of this website.


March 2005

Q) Does the no close-no sale language apply to bankruptcy?  And can Delphi file bankruptcy on the holding groups alone, or do they have to do it worldwide?

A) The International Union has advised us that the agreement obligates General Motors to guarantee layoff benefits, pensions, retiree health care, and post-retirement life insurance to UAW represented Delphi workers who were employed by GM under the terms of the 1996 UAW/GM National agreement as of the spin-off of Delphi as of May 28, 1999.  These benefits will be guaranteed by GM in the event of financial distress at Delphi at any time on or before the eighth anniversary of the effective date of the 1999-2003 UAW GM National agreement.  The parties further agreed that in the event of financial distress which causes Delphi to terminate its pension plan or cease to provide on-going credited service, GM will provide up to seven years of credited service of the level and scope in effect at Delphi at the time.  

In answer to the second part of your question, The International Union has advised us that Delphi cannot just file bankruptcy on the Automotive Holding Group alone.


Q) What kind of number are they looking at laying off now, without the schedules going down or G.M. slowing down?  Will those that are on layoff be out until those with 30+ years are gone?

A) The shop committee is opposed to laying off anyone.  Local Delphi management has stated that there is an excess of employees in the plant.  We have been successful in keeping the majority of these "excess" employees working because of management's agreement to use voluntary layoffs for as long as we have volunteers.  If we have no volunteers for layoff, we will know at that time the exact number of employees that could face layoff.

The International Union has an agreement with Delphi that excess employees would be placed in the JOBS bank rather than laid off, up to the hiring requirement number.  This hiring requirement number is being verified by the International Union, but we are confident that it is around 100 for production employees.  

Further, under Appendix K of the 2003 UAW/Delphi National agreement, anyone laid off due as a result of outsourcing is also JOBS bank eligible.  This would include any members affected by the loss of the GMX-130 and the P-90 due to the closure of the Lansing facility.  It would also include any members affected by the possible loss of the OEM Shoe & Lining business.

In answer to the last part of your question, anyone who is laid off or placed in the JOBS bank can be recalled to traditional work in the plant if we have retirements, flowbacks, or an increase in schedules.  Any of these events or a combination of these events can trigger a recall.


Q) Are those that retire under the 2004 contract guaranteed a pension and benefits by G.M. if Delphi goes under after 2007?   Also should the present qualified employees at our plant put in to go to a G.M. plant now?

A) We have been advised by the International Union that if Delphi folds before 2007, GM will cover all pensions and benefits.  If it folds after 2007, it is up for bargaining between the International UAW, Delphi and GM.  As to the second part of your question, neither the Local nor the International Union can advise you whether you should or should not flow back to General Motors.  We can provide you with the facts regarding your current situation, but the final decision is yours.  We also want to remind our members that under the current agreement, they have until December 31st, 2006 to apply for flowback.


February 2005

Q) We have several rows of light bulbs that are burned out over our assembly area.  We've notified our supervisor, but nothing has been done about it.

A) In the interests of privacy, we deleted your name and department number from your submission above.  We forwarded your concern to your committeeperson, who then contacted the maintenance department.  Your committeeperson has verified with you that the situation has been resolved.  All UAW 696 members should be aware that proper lighting is required not only for safety, but for quality as well.  Please contact your committeeperson if your maintenance requests are not being met.

 

 

 

Copyright © 2006-2007 UAW Local 696